:smack:
Well, I should let him respond for himself, but my interpretation is that he believes that Sarah Palin should feel a sense of responsibility for her part in creating an atmosphere of gun violence, not that she’s personally “responsible” for the gunman’s actions.
I could be wrong, though.
What?
It’s happened. 
Really? I wasn’t aware he’d been diagnosed with anything as of yet. Got a cite?
Is this yet another fact Dr. MoGlow is pulling out of his ass?
He asked for use of crosshairs in popular culture not to purposely google for something (“use of a transit”) that will give you surveyors instruments. Unless you think that most readers of Palin’s blog/facebook are surveyors or anyone else who have thought surveyors instruments over a gun (particularly in context, you know CONTEXT).
This thread is so pathetic and yet so expected in many ways. Lame rationalizations and dissembling to outright lies (misrepresenting TV shows and cited websites). You’d think people would know not to try to sell such an obvious lemon but, hey, Dick Cheney was able to get the guy he shot to apologize to him. I guess nothing is too mendacious for the American right.
Luckily, no one really expects Sarah Palin to take responsibility for this shooting. That would be so out of character. I doubt she’d take responsibility if she personally put the gun in the guy’s hands. “I didn’t think he’d actually DO it!” She’s not lying though. She simply lacks the self-awareness and thoughtfulness required for this type of self analysis. Not to mention an absence of any kind of real moral compass. True for all of them. The response of outraged innocence smeared with the persecution complex and the weak and dishonest attempts at tu quoques is EXACTLY what you would expect from these people and their message board apologists.
Well I see that you have added nothing of value to the thread. Why am I not surprised.
Is it the libs that are calling for kinder discourse? Maybe if the self-professed libs actual practice what they preach, then people might actually follow their advice.
The way they are going though, won’t help their cause.
No, he has not. I’m sure he is schizophrenic or something similar, but he has not been diagnosed with anything. It’s important to support your argument with facts.
Perhaps the shooter shouted “sic semper transit” as he pulled the trigger.
As do you, apparently.
That’s the point people are trying to make. Do you remember that the left burned and hanged President Bush in effigy. Do you remember the violent discourse from the left. Is your memory shot or are you simply in denial?
I know ya’all are getting edgy 'cause you see your leftist agenda going up in smoke, daily. But seriously these types of posts, filled with hypocrisy and blame without any willingness to accept their own role in violent political discourse, will not help your case.
Do you not realize that? Do you not see that even moderate Dems are starting to become angry at the leftist violent rhetoric and propensity for blaming.
No, he hasn’t. (Although I’m sure he will be in time.)
No, it can’t.
unlikely
Now, that’s possible.
I have. Recently and literally, in fact, for nursing class. And the vast majority of them are not violent, to themselves or to other people.
And yet, when someone does this as I did not half an hour ago, you completely ignore the post. That’s called confirmation bias. Since you’re such a fan of wikipedia, here’s a cite:Confirmation bias - Wikipedia
Grand. Ignore away, I’m heartbroken :rolleyes:
Your countrymen and women need no help from me to show you as the xenophobic partisan moron you are. You don’t have to be changed by their opinions just keep posting your idiocy to this thread that’s enough to get the job done.
You talk out of your ass so much that you’re going to need KY just to prevent chafing.
Is it really your argument that anything could “set off” a person with schizophrenia, so therefore it couldn’t be political rhetoric? How does that work?
Pretty accurate. However, hiding behind your Media Director or Webmaster or Freelance Graphic Artist ( as is the case here ) is beyond lame. She is the public face of The Sarah Palin Machine. She is responsible for the words she speaks and the ideas and agenda put forth and supported by written words and graphics.
If she’s not, then she’d be nothing more than a mindless puppet being manipulated by others to further an agenda she does not support. That can’t be it. Can it?
MoGlow, are you yourself currently institutionalized?
That xenophobic partisan moron bit is pretty darn obvious! But it was useful to see that she’s as ignorant of Ireland as she is of her own country…
Oh goody. Crikey. You guys are too easy. I was hoping you would challenge me.
So, you think the leftist rag Salon.com, engages in inaccurate reporting. In the article they are interviewing a leftist shrink.
Here’s the link to a Salon article titled “Loughner a “textbook” case paranoid schizophrenic”
It’s a well known fact that anything can set off a paranoid schizophrenic except political rhetoric. It repels them like garlic repels vampires. In fact, why is nobody investigating the link between the “occult” shooter and liberal pothead vampires?
OK, then in the interest of fairness and free speech, and using her own terminology, she should be “targeted for removal”.
Let’s watch the shit fly now
So you don’t know what “diagnose” means either. The list of words you don’t understand or can’t spell is getting pretty long. Diagnose, hypocritical, ad hominem, too, cite…
I see that Molly Ivins does your thinking for you?
That’s a nice bit of word salad. I see that L:cool:oughner has brought out your dark side.
Oh your so intellectual, aren’t you? Another accusation unsupported by fact. So typically leftist hypocritical liberal
Don’t feel inadequate. I like my mice. I really do. 