My goodness, modern psychiatry has come so far since the days when a psychiatrist had to actually speak to a patient before making a diagnosis!
There is hope for you yet! Just put one hand on your computer, and the other hand on the place on your head where all the voices are coming from, and you too can be diagnosed by a random stranger!
So you were hoping we would challenge you so you could prove to us you were lying?
That’s kinda strange.
From the OP:
And if that doesn’t convince you, we have the following thread no in play (though, to be fair, I believe it was opened after your post):
Hey Steve, it only seems rational logical and intelligent to focus your discontent at someone who can actually change your life.
It seems that the liberals simply can not fathom that Palin does not have that power at this point. Palin should be targeted for removal from what political position?
Has anyone seen curlcoat lately? This thread is making me miss her.
You said he’s been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic. He hasn’t. An article speculating about his symptoms is not a diagnosis. I think the author is right, and I said on Saturday that this guy was probably schizophrenic, but that’s not a diagnosis. Around here we try to be factually correct about that. Stop stroking your mouse and you might catch on.
Hypocrisy and denial is not strange. It’s the liberal way of life.
It’s interesting that you would choose the word lying. I do not think the liberals lie. It think they really believe their own press. Now that’s strange.
Are you saying that a liberal lied, or might lie.
I see you do not understand the meaning of a “textbook case.” One would have had to attend university to understand what that implies.
Splitting hairs does not help your case.
“Textbook case” is a figure of speech, not a medical term. It means “the kind of case you might see in a textbook.” And it’s not a diagnosis.
Being wrong isn’t helping your case - although it hasn’t deterred you so far.
Oh you are too easy. So you admit that it’s wrong to jump to conclusions about cause and effect. So you admit that the leftist rag salon.com is being irresponsible by writing an article in which a leftist psychiatrist claims this:
I agree it is not responsible to jump to conclusions by definitively labeling someone, or jumping to conclusions about blame or reasons for the attack before all the evidence is in?
I am glad we agree. 
I am glad that pointing out that the leftist rag Salon.com was jumping to conclusions, might get your pantaloons in a twist.
Now do you see anything wrong with the title of this thread?
Don’t forget “effect,” as in “Your political beliefs will not effect me…”
Personally, my guess is that some sort of gastrointestinal process effected MoGlow.
Why limit it only to people who directly affect me? That’s too limiting. Why not anyone who merely disagrees with my personal “world view”? Why do I have to be careful who I “mark”? I say SAME RULES FOR EVERYONE.
I say, let’s all slap rifle scope targets on anyone who is not exactly in line with what I want. I say, we need a second amendment solution to oust the tyrants and / or potential tyrants who might some day, have some remote chance of “tyrannizing” me - whether they were duly elected by the majority or not. How dare anyone not think exactly like me and revolve around what I want for me.
Fair is fair. GUNSIGHT GRPAHICS ALL AROUND. Everyone gets to demand that someone else be taken out. A candidate for office or celebrity who disagrees, gets the Graphic Of Doom. A TV or radio talking head who doesn’t see things my way gets the Graphic Of Doom. If we can talk about the liberals destroying the country and talk about gunning them down (all in fun of course) to take the country back then we can talk about giving the conservatives a few pot shots too.
Why is it OK for one but not the other? That’s hypocritical bull shit.
Palin could have been Vice President, a heartbeat away from the Presidency. If McCain had won and then died, Palin WOULD have been President. That’s damn high up the chain. So let’s slap a target thing on her pictures. Fair and balanced.
You forgot to say “Crikey!”.
Am I wrong? Are you paying attention.
I like it when my mice think I am stupid. It makes it easier to confuse them.
I will be back to play another day. I have things to do. Meanwhile I will miss you. 
He’s a leftist psychiatrist? How do you ascertain this? Is it because he was contacted by the radical Trotskyist site Salon? Or because he has put forth notions you find disagreeable?
And may I ask a further question? How did you happen to find Straight Dope? We’re not all that famous. Were you assigned to us, or are you a volunteer?
Again, you need to focus, my man. Focus on the people in power. Palin lost. You do realize that? Why are the liberals so deranged by her? That’s the burning question.
Gotta’ go. Later:p
Now don’t get all paranoid on me. 
Which do you prefer? Assigned, or volunteered???
Hey I am having fun, but i really gotta’ go. I will be back when time allows. 
Yes, you’re wrong. He is probably schizophrenic, but you said he’s been diagnosed with it, which is incorrect. He has not been diagnosed with any mental illness yet. I think that’s the fourth time I’ve said it.
There really is something about arrogant idiots on the 'net, isn’t there? ‘Dance, puppets, dance! Continues to prove my arguments wrong and my characterizations nonsensical - it only brings me closer to total victory!’