Can you sit on Satan’s lap and get a candy pitchfork?
They never last very long, since everyone keeps walking into them because they’re invisible.
Blasphemy!!! Burn him!!!
Wait…Boil him!!!
The Satanic Temple, to be precise. Not the Church of Satan, nor the First Satanic Church. You don’t wanna mix them up.
You understand, of course, that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is waving his middle noodley appendage at you. 
This is one of those inter-mural sort of things, like the Judean People’s Front versus the People’s Front of Judea, right?
Good. Basically, several groups are protesting the nativity scene, so have applied for the right to display. A Satanic group, American Atheists, Festivus, and Flying Spaghetti Monster have all made the list this year.
Accepting and allowing it is religious endorsement unless the option is available to all.
Doesn’t matter. The right of the Florida Prayer Network to use the government state house to promote their message of christianity for the holidays is the same right for the Satanic Temple to promote their message of “Fuck you, Christianity”.
How is it any less appropriate than a depiction of some guy being crucified?
This is for Christmas, not Easter.
Regards,
Shodan
I’ve been rooting for a Wiccan group to put up a large phallus. I suppose they’d want to do that in spring, not winter, though.
Naaa, the nativity scene is a bunch of people standing around in a barn looking at a kid laying in a feeding trough.
You’re kidding, right? I’ve known preachers who specifically target children for this kind of imagery. “Put the fear of god into 'em!”
It’d be cool if the angel was made to look like Viggo Mortensen.
Not really. The Church of Satan is an organization founded in 1967 by Anton LaVey that promotes a particular philosophy - I’ve heard it called “atheism on steroids, with a big dose of Fuck You to the Catholic Church”.
Lucian Greaves’ Satanic Temple, from what I’ve read, is essentially an activist group focused on church-state separation. Trying to get Satanic monuments in public buildings is how they draw attention to the difficulties of recognizing all religions, rather than none, by governments.
I’ve read an interview with Lucien Greaves - he seems a pretty smart and articulate guy.
Example: The Satanic Children’s Big Book of Activities (warning: PDF).
Could’ve hired a better artist though – it’s kind of a shitty painting.
Satan is sick and tired of getting all those dyslexic children’s Xmas list letters.
Originally posted by tellyworth
The Satanic Temple, to be precise. Not the Church of Satan, nor the First Satanic Church. You don’t wanna mix them up.
Or there’ll be Hell to pay.
I think it awful.
It’s just pissing on someone parade to be a duchbag. People should have respect for each other.
Festivus and Life Day are all good fun. At least for most people. Those taking it as an FU to other religions are the white guy that Dave Chappelle didn’t want laughing at his jokes.
If the Stamp Collecting Society got permission to do a display I don’t think that entitles the Stamp Collectors are a Bunch of Pussies that will never get Laid Society to get equal consideration because it’s just a hate group.
Well, typing that makes me think I’m technically wrong. That’s is what my sense of right and wrong tells me is decent behavior. But there is the constitution that I strongly believe in that allows hate groups like the KKK and the Westboro Baptist Church that look to be a blight on society and it’s better they operate out in the open where they can be seen then to fester in hiding.
They are trolling Christmas and Hanukkah and simply should be ashamed of themselves.
I do get the two mixed up once the discussion strays from the bunny and santa level.
Are you insinuating something? 
Well, that depends on where the display is. If the display is on privately-owned property, then you’re totally right. It’s okay for private individuals to play favorites with their own property. But when you’re talking about government property, that belongs to the Stamp Collectors are Pussies Society just as much as it does to the Stamp Collecting Society. Playing favorites with communal property, allocating it entirely for the use of one set of owners and denying another set of owners any access, is completely, entirely, wholly wrong. It’s a violation of the concept of communal property, and is a real asshole way to behave. When the communal property is the government, and owner access is based on religion, it’s also unconstitutional.