Sounds to me more like a defense mechanism.
- me.
*Al pasar la barca
me dijo el barquero
las niñas bonitas
no pagan dinero.
Yo no soy bonita
ni lo quiero ser
yo pago dinero
una, dos y tres.*
Children’s song used for rhythmic games such as rope-jumping and rubber-band-skipping; lots of variations found in the web. I know my grandmothers already sang it, but maybe it was written by a 19th century feminist.
As I took the ferry
the ferryman said
that girls who are pretty
do not pay in coin.
But I am not pretty
nor wish I to be
I pay with my money
one and two and three.
BWAHAHAHAHA!
This might be the funniest and most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read on this board. What you do is engage in a veritable orgy of cutting and snipping (and omitting) thing’s I’ve said, rearranging them into something they never were before, and then concocting motives, beliefs and assertions based upon the Frankenstein post you’ve created and assigning them to me.
Either that, or you simply have the worst problem with reading comprehension I’ve seen in my fifteen years here.
As an example of what I’m talking about, let’s take a look at what I said in regard to the conversation I related that took place between the 17-year-old boy and me. Here’s what I said:
This, I think, would be pretty cut-and-dried to most people. I related a story about a young guy “objectifying” a young woman and made the observation that even after 50 years of anti-male feminism, nothing has really changed. My post says that right there in black and white.
But once it goes through he patented Kimstu Bullshit Confabulator it comes out like this:
First of all, she makes an error in ascribing my response to this kid as illustrative of ‘penisfeelings’ of my own. Had I intended to do that I would have posted more than a wink emoji, which was intended merely to acknowledge the young boy’s comment. Had I intended to convey penisfeelings of my own, I’d have responded with with something like “Hell, yeah, I’d bang her myself!” instead of merely acknowledging what he said with a wink.
And then, instead of acknowledging the inconvenient truth that after all this time, and all the efforts that have been put into insulting men into changing their behavior, nothing of substance has really changed, she chooses to twist these comments into an insistence that I feel entitled to share these so-called penisfeelings whenever and wherever I like without regard to the wishes of my audience.
That she pulls these stunts should be obvious to anyone with a third-grade reading level. But her unthinking (or uncaring) audience eats it up.
Then notice also the frequent insertion (if I may be so bold, in such delicate company as this) of prejudicial verbiage with which she persistently peppers her posts. She claims I have expectations which I’ve never voiced; that I have “views” which I now only have but which have never occurred to me - mostly because they’re stupid; and that I not only make these “mistakes” which she falsely attributes to me, but that I make them “persistently.”
As I said in the inappropriately named “Slut-Shaming” thread, these obvious and transparent tactics represent a sort of verbal sleight-of-hand which she dishonestly employs to compose misleading gobbledegook posts that allow her to play to a willing and supportive audience eager to express their admiration for her ability to put me in my place in ways they could never hope to equal.
What they likely fail to realize is that it’s their own sense of honesty, integrity and propriety that prevents them from posting the way she does.
How … Gentlemanly.
I’ll leave your rebuttal to Kimstu for her to deal with. She is far more polite than I am, and will cut your shrivelling dick down even further.
But I will respond to THIS:
I can’t imagine any 17yr old boy having such a conversation with a geriatric man. Sure, he might well talk like this with his peers, but with YOU? And you are just an acquaintance of this young boy, why didn’t you pull him up and tell him his remarks might be fine in the privacy of his homies, but really inappropriate to be shared with relative strangers? The fact that you didn’t just reinforces that gendered behaviours like the ones we’ve been talking about in this very thread, are perpetuated down the generations by the men ‘sharing’ their misogyny.
See above.
Then may I suggest you begin blithely posting bullshit instead of taking things so seriously. Posters such as you, Missy2u, and even kambucta, post from your heart. I disagree with you but I don’t doubt your honesty.
Kimstu, on the other hand, is merely playing games and thus is easily able to remain unruffled.
I also suspect, given the large amounts of time that frequently passes between my larger posts and her responses, that she spends hours and hours painstakingly constructing her Frankenstein-like revisions of my posts. Were you willing to be as imaginative and dishonest as Kimstu is, and willing to devote as much time to working up your rejoinders, I suspect you (or any of the board’s posters) could post in a similarly equanimous way.
From where I am you two and Kimstu and many other women look like Super Heroes fighting the Willfully Reliant Assholes Who Want To Continue To Demean Women So They Don’t Have Their Penisfeelings Hurt.
And to that I say you Ladies are Marvelous! 
Starving Artist Said:
“I’m a Willfully Reliant Asshole Who Wants To Continue To Demean Women So I Don’t Have My Penisfeelings Hurt Because God Damnit I Was Entitled To It In The Past And I Should Be Entitled To It Until I Die!”
Yes, you pedophile-loving, woman hating, asshole, we all see you for the despicable thing you are.
I can not wait until your generation dies off.
The world will be a much more peaceful place.
You are kidding me, right?
You who have to waltz off into the sunset every night and leave the thread because of ‘commitments’ and you can’t imagine that other people have commitments too?
Too funny by half. :D:D
I have to thank SA . I haven’t read this thread in several days, but when I saw he posted, I peeked. His attempt to '50s mansplain things is usually good for a cheap laugh. To my supreme delight I found Kimstu’s “penisfeelings”.
It is unfortunate that I found it in this particular thread however. Because I know I’m going to want to use it as much as possible. And much like “hot chick” it isn’t something that will slide smoothly into most conversations.
90% of my coworkers are female. Imagined conversation at meeting…
Coworker 1: So we all agree on the wording of the new policy?
Me: Yes. I learned a new word.
Coworkers (with a mildly interested but mostly WTF look): And?
Me: Penisfeelings.
Careful, lest you force me to post not only penisfeelings but penisbehavior.
This is a problem you reveal frequently.
Here you make two errors, one understandable and one merely stupid. It’s understandable that you might think me geriatric, but I can assure you that no one who knows me in person thinks of me that way.
But it’s just plain stupid for you to have missed what I’ve posted twice now, which is that I’ve become close to this kid. We’ve known each other for close to a year and have become good friends. He is not a mere acquaintance.
Of course. He has a another buddy I’ve become close to as well, and when we’re together it’s like I’m 17-years-old again myself and back with my old buddies. They really are a bad influence on me.
Hopefully you’re disabused of this notion now.
Perhaps you might want to pick up a dictionary and investigate the meaning of “misogyny.” It doesn’t mean “anything that any woman somewhere doesn’t like.” It requires such things as hatred, contempt, mistrust for, or prejudice against, women…i.e., the feeling that they’re inferior.
Calling a woman a “hot chick,” or stating, as this boy did, “I’d hit it!” is not misogyny, just like a woman talking about some cute or hot guy she saw is not misandry.
Such comments about women are actually a compliment in the eyes of the men who make them, and to most of the men who hear them.
Actually, the world was a much more peaceful place prior to the ascendancy of liberalism. Now we’ve got a thousand different groups all hating each other because none of the groups behave the way the other groups have decided they should. Everywhere one turns there’s “privilege this” and “racial” that, “cultural appropriation here” and “transgender bathrooms” there, and Christmas here and the War On Christmas there, etc., etc., etc. multiplied a hundred fold. You’ve turned this into a country of human piranhas in a feeding frenzy where all are eating each other. People have gotten fed up with it and the result is that Donald Trump sits in the Oval Office.
Good job, libbies.
Are you threatening me?
Really? You’re hanging out with 17yr olds? Why?
I really need some brain bleach folks. Fuck me dead…I am truly skeeved out now.
Read the thread again Creepy Old Guy. And again, and again. It’s not a compliment if the women who are hearing it are not feeling complimented. Just because your penisfeelings are warm and mushy, doesn’t mean that women are feeling the same.
(Off to wash my brain out) BBS.
Nonbinary and agender people exist, and they’re not just damaged men and women. They lie on different more intermediate parts of the gender spectrum (and in some cases, they feel more comfortable saying they’re off it entirely). I’m sure there are some people somewhere that claim to have nonbinary identities for reasons other than truly identifying that way, but it’s extremely transphobic to just insist that someone who dresses androgynously and goes by they/them just has a “defense mechanism”. In fact, that’s a known TERF talking point.
This doesn’t necessarily mean Dangerosa is being TERFy about her child, they may have had a talk about this and her child may have confirmed that, for them, that is indeed the case, hence my caveat that Dangerosa knows her kid better than I do. But without knowing that such a clarification took place from them, I feel the need to defend nonbinary peoples’ identities.
Yeah, toilets and the War on Christmas. Oh, and women, they’re to blame too of course. All for the downfall of western democracy. 
You really are a fascinating specimen of how the sperm hit the wrong egg (or vice versa) SA. Or does inbred stupidity just run in your family?
And, just as the rainbow follows the rain[sup]*[/sup], the rape threats follow the impotent anger over a woman’s refusal to defer to a man’s opinions or to shut up when he tells her to. Too bad you can’t actually rape someone over the internet, I bet that pisses Starvikins off something fierce.
That 17 year old better sleep clutching his paper towel tube tight out of fear of deflected anger seeking a nearby target.
[sup]*[/sup]Or the shitbird follows the bull, I forget which.
Yep, with information you don’t want to hear.
Not in the way your question implies. Our time together usually lasts but a few minutes but occurs multiple times over the course of a week or month. Much less than 1% of my time is spent with them.
Because I like them and we enjoy each other’s company.
Perhaps you have a better imagination after all than you typically reveal in your posts.
I’m quite aware that the women here, steeped as they have been in lib thought all or most of their lives, don’t feel complimented and don’t agree with me.
I’m also aware that they are in the minority, that their opinions are not controlling, and that they should not be.
People are happier when they’re not liberals.
Why do you think you’re the only person spewing this crap? You’re right? I think you may need to rethink your position on this subject. Cause you’re wrong buster. And guess what? Those two 17yos are laughing at the old geezer trying to act cool
ETA have they asked you to buy them some beers yet?
Ah, congratulations! Now you’re getting onboard the Kimstu train. Kindly point out, if you will, which words of mine lead you to believe I blame women for these things.
And also which words led you to add the intensifier: “of course.”
I’ll reply to the rest of your stupidity in a minute, but this here?
People are happier when they’re not liberals?
I don’t know where to start! Isn’t it the conservatives who are the chronic whingers?
They don’t like dark people, they don’t like affirmative action, they don’t like non-Christians, they don’t like science, they don’t like people being able to access healthcare, they don’t like the unemployed (but they do approve of the theory of trickle-down economics) they don’t like women being uppity, they get pissed when called out on their essential misogyny and sexist attitudes, they don’t like free education, they don’t like compulsory ANYTHING, they do like guns but they don’t like the prospect of having guns regulated…I could go on and on and ON, but I have an appointment with my comfy lounge-chair that beckons.
And I’m a happy liberal. The thing that would make me happier is to not have to argue stupid shit about sexism on a messageboard in 2018. I thought we finished this crap like 20yrs ago. Yep, it’s taking longer than we thought.
