Saying Hot Chick = Being A Misogynist Asshole

If he’s married to a male worldview, does that mean he supports SSM?

And not for the first time. It’s his thang.

Yes he did. We libbies have ruined the joint.

Penis Feelings, it’s not exactly the same usage, but it’s a pretty close match.

Enjoy,
Steven

I should note that Tom Lehrer’s “National Brotherhood Week,” a song about how every group hates every other group, was written in 1964 or 1965.

ETA: Yes, America was much more peaceful in the 1950s when black people didn’t try to attend the same schools as whites did, and when Jews were banned from the best country clubs.

Me, too.

Can someone change the thread title of this thread? The moron that posted it didn’t write it correctly.
“Saying Hot Chick = Being A Misogynist Asshole” should read, “Saying Hot Chick AND Being A Misogynist Asshole” or “When Saying Hot Chick = Being A Misogynist Asshole”

The world would be a much better place if Ruby had acted the way other groups* wanted her to.
*white people
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s not the only thing. Traditionalist pre-1960 mores didn’t permit the labeling of well dressed upper class women as, “Hot chicks”. Contemporary mores don’t allow it either, for separate reasons.

To find a time where such behavior is acceptable, you have to turn your clock back to a few months during the shag carpet era. Shortly after “Groovy” fell out of use, but way before “Dude” became popular.

This is why this particular episode of ‘The Starving Artist Show’ makes no fucking sense. I really wish more people, if they are going to focus on SA, would focus on this contradiction.

Alls I can think is that we ain’t allowed to adopt some of his mores without adopting all of them . . . while ignoring the actual effects and back stories of his mores.

CMC fnord!

I actually have some sympathies with traditionalist conservatism. What I’ve only figured out recently is that it’s been pretty much abandoned by modern conservatives. Ironically, modern conservatives have very little sense of history.

Oh? Which aspects?

I know most of those in this thread who could be reached by this likely already have been, but this is a really nice piece about issues raised by this thread: #MeToo movement: what so many men are missing - Vox

One example: traditional Christians are demanding of themselves, merciful to others. They don’t let themselves off easy.

Cite from 1832. Read the full page to get a flavor: Maxims of Piety and of Christianity. New edition - Thomas Wilson - Google Books

I obtained that open source work by googling “chrisitan piety judge not lest ye be judged”
[INDENT] *Judges ought to take care to examine every thing, but especially their own hearts, lest passion and prejudice should pervert justice.

You see a poor man working hard for his daily bread, and but just able to get it. You find yourself in easy circumstances; you want nothing; you fear no want, you meet with no trouble; you bless yourself and your condition, and think yourself happier than the poor man. You do not consider, after all, that this was in some measure the case of Lazarus and the rich man; and that the poor man is in a fairer way to heaven than you are. This will make you thoughtful. * [/INDENT]

From the link:

Yes, indeed, it’s all the same spectrum.

Thanks for the link wonky. :slight_smile:

That is a brilliant metaphor. Absolutely spot on.

Ah, I thought you were speaking of political conservatives.
Me, I believe in fiscal responsibility and emphasizing fundamentals in education.

Both these positions make us flaming liberals now.

Great read. Thanks!

Can’t we even use it descriptively? “The one on the right, yeah the hot one.”

What a malevolent little troglodyte you are. Crawl back under your bridge.