So you then run and get elected.
Do I detect the dawning of a realization that others are correct?
So in the end you support to have them hide their crimes when there is no force available to take people to justice. Sorry, not even the “socialized” police will stand for that.
Pretty simple. Mob rules, or producers rule. Do you want an evironment friendly to the mob, or the producers? My factual basis is the early US, yours is Cuba.
You bringing that up** is ** like seeing a mobster in action. Stop doing that, are you smart enough to see the difference or you still want to be certified an idiot by everybody here? I do not follow Cuba, stop insulting the intelligence of all the readers.
And you still need to get your cites, you think no one will notice how you behave like if they are not needed? Get them or otherwise you are also a pathetic loser besides a lexicon thug.
Liberalism and the left provided the mob rules atmosphere that let both men off. That is the way the public wanted it … Right. The overwhelming vote was for war. Rhight. Why can’t poeple understand that it was voted for in the beginning? Rights were given up. People died, and you keep arguing for the process that garnered it. Democracy. Where is my oil? BTW, I make weapons electronics.
And, the Early US (The southern states) supported independence in part because Britain was offering freedom to the slaves if they would oppose the growing American revelion.
No, you can not have your slaves, nor your stupid arguments.
The left in the US will never gain power in a mob, hence the reason why I do not have that position, and I’m on the record elsewere that even if I had the chance I would refuse that kind of rule if I had the control. But you are an idiot for insisting we do. And I already mentioned that the mainstream media and other powers influenced their votes, it may not mean anything to your tiny brain, but many of those that voted for are sorry that they did, even Republicans.
Jump back a few years and you will see that they were all about confining the growth and powers of the government. The left were the slave owners by the way. Jump ahead a few years and you get the IRS and then social engineering into law. These are progressive? Those are viable only in political vote buying. It worked
Today the Exxon damned punishment for being profitable and the Scooter trial are more important than letting the producers produce. That is the true evil.
You will need a big fat cite for that, I would never thought you would dig even deeper, but wonders never end!
They are progressive only as the current leaders are.
No that is called a hijack, and it is an evil here in the SDMB.
I need a cite for the constitution? It gives small powers but mostly gaurantees freedoms. In fact it gives the right to defend the country. That is the only right that is specifically given to the federal government. Not taxes, Not social enginerring, Not healthcare.
You might want to read that some time.
Context you naboob, you need to explain how the slave owner “left” of the revolution turned into the same “left” that decided to start the Civil War to keep the right to enslave others. That same “left” then opposed civil rights, against yet another left that you seem to have blind spot in your eyes.
Do a search for the word “Democracy” while you are there.
You aint gonna find it.
Of course you knew that, right.
Maybe the BBQ is a good place to find ppl without a leg to stand on.
Meh, the evidence so far in this thread alone shows that you are the one that needs remedial history courses. Not knowing the differences with Nazis, communists, the left of today or the “left” of slave owners with the modern left. What you only have demonstrated is that you are proud of that ignorance.
Well done! I needed to mop the floor of my kitchen. 
OK you win here are the cites
http://www.dickrussell.org/articles/robeson02.htm
http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/3563957.html
Everyone knows that the liberals at that time were the slave owners. Much the way that the controlling party today is the “owner” of the poor people and controlling their votes unwittingly.
Let that be a lesson to all you kids: do not turn Libertarian!
I mentioned that this discussion would be better in the great debates. I’m new here and will bow to the way to do things. If you even want to debate me personally, I would invite it. I really have to think a thread would be started in the GD’s over this. Either way, don’t punish the producers, punish the weak. LOL
The word “Democracy” does not appear anywhere in the consitution. That one has been done a few.
Way to miss the point, I retorted that because you said that “My factual basis is the early US” implying that was a noble thing to use as a model, and that I was using the Cuban one, finding evidence that the start of the American Nation had little to do with democratic ideals or even libertarian ones (unless you are making the point slavery is a Libertarian ideal) weakens your sorry point then, which was what I wanted to demonstrate.
The word gullible is not in the dictionary.
In any case I did not base the “ideal” nation in the origin of the USA nor I did made democracy an important point in the discussion, what you have there is a straw man, one of the most dumb fallacies to be used in these parts.
IMHO it was only after the civil war and getting vote to the women and the civil rights that America finally became the stuff that was mentioned in the constitution and the bill of rights.
Can you make the point then against my competive society? One that would declare war only when war was declared on it? Can you make a point for freedom in a society that uses force for your health care? OH that isn’n’t force, is it? You took their gun away.