With the timetable to draft a new Scotland Bill with devolved powers so tight, and having signed the Edinburgh Agreement commitment to work together with the Westminster Parliament for the common good of Scotland and the UK following any referendum result, what does he do? He makes himself a lame duck leader unable to commit his party to anything before November when they elect a new leader.
Whilst he has been apparently dignified, that is not what I call statesmanship in a time that calls for unity. He is surely not intending to keep his hands clean for a third tilt at the leadership at some future point is he? Surely even this fat snug bloater doesn’t have the balls to pull that trick off does he?
I do not like the man but an really unimpressed that he has left us in the lerch.
Meanwhile - in answer to an earlier question - I do not expect another referendum on independence within the next 20 odd years. The only thing that could trigger one might be something like the UK voting to leave the EU and Scotland’s vote being no. Events, dear boy, events…
I’m not surprised about Salmond. At this point, I don’t know what the purpose of the Scottish National Party will be, going forward. Up until now, they have based their entire existence on arguing for independence. Well, that’s over. What now? Are they going to become an ordinary left party? Are they going to lose the bulk of their support to Labor and the Liberals? How are they going to sustain their support?
The no vote is the best thing that could happen to the party in regards to longevity. This way, they get to continue arguing for independence. If the vote had gone yes, they would have gotten what they wanted and lost their purpose.
I don’t know if such a test would ask about Scottish culture. I mean culture in it’s loosest sense. You’d be surprised at how much the game dominates life in Scotland. It’s similar to asking an applicant for US citizenship about the World Series.
Aye, and let’s be clear, it was unionists fighting with other unionists. This was not some conflict between the two sides, it was a bunch of violent loons spoiling for a fight.
Some folks on the winning side decided to start a riot.
Heard all sorts of stuff, seig heiling, a fatal stabbing etc. It is kinda hard to separate fact from fiction. It is sad that people chose to reaffirm the union so divisively.
The fatal stabbing as far as I can tell is not true. There were six arrests. The same “shocking” pics are being posted everywhere. Im guessing this is being exaggerated for poltical effect. Who’d have ever thought that possible?
For me the interesting bit of that article was them feeling able to come out and say that they voted No. There was a significant amount of bullying and intimidation by the Yes camp.