Scott Walker recall takes an unexpected turn.

You forgot Business Employment Dynamics (BED), Job Openings and Layoffs Survey (JOLTS) and Occupational Employment Statistics (OES). And then there’s the National Compensation Survey, but that’s a little different.

It’s actually a large sample, approx 428,000 establishments (way larger than the CPS which is not revised). But because the reference period is the Pay Period that contains the 12th, and because there are multiple rounds of collection (due to a lot of late reporting) there are 2 revisions.

Not quite. The CPS is conducted by the Census Bureau for BLS. The Local Area Unemployment data (states and metro areas) are a Fed-State collaboration because, while 60,000 households is fine for the National numbers, the sample from each state/metro area is too small and must be supplemented with admin data from the states.

The CES is all BLS. The QCEW is a Fed-State Program based on UI records.

They’re already gutting the 40-hour week in a bunch of different ways.

So I imagine the reverse is also true? If Walker and his allies retain office, the results will be seen across the country as approval for the premise that cutting taxes for the rich while attacking unions and slashing services will spur job growth?

Or does it work only one way?

It will be taken as a sign that perhaps people power can’t beat money power after all, not in this year of grace.

In one of the districts the Republican incumbant got caught hiring his mistress for a job on his staff. His own wife signed the recall petition against him. I have a vague recollection of the other loser not being well liked.

Just trying to say that specific on the ground circumstances often govern these things.

A big rap on Walker is that he is widely seen as extremely divisive and not to be trusted.

Walker retained the endorsement of the Milwaukee Journal which basically said he wasn’t bad enough to recall. He lost the endorsements of the police and firefighters unions.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/we-recommend-walker-his-removal-isnt-justified-l55ecb6-152111305.html

I remember the Gingrich proposal, it’s not like he was advocating hard work, just work. Nothing in his proposal intending to break up the union, that was pure conjecture on the author of that posts part.

This is the part I’d like a cite on:

Let the author reply this time.

Do you really want a list of every progressive advance from 1900-2000 and any steps taken by Republicans to repeal them? Or are you willing to accept that this can be construed (by anyone not obsessed with pedantry) as a generalization?

His proposal was to have the kids do a job that a paid staff of adults were doing now. That still falls afoul of child worker laws. Your distinction between “hard work” and “work” are irrelevant.

And I agree that a whole list is ridiculous. You should set smaller goals, like listing, say, five or so big advances that were subsequently challenged by at least a proposed bill.

So salaried people don’t get overtime. Corporations sure are gutting federal law with that bit of news.
Do you have a point other than that?

Could you list the corporations who you feel could get away with it without backlash?

Did I forget to raise my hand?
Or is it because I’m hurting his participation grade?

Child Labor has already been mentioned, and this thread is because of attacks on unions. So in addition to those:
Labor Rights Under Republican Attack
GOP War on Workers’ Rights
Republican Transportation Bill Strips Workers of Pay Protection - Lowers minimum wage, removes overtime pay
Missouri GOP Pushes Revised Bill on Worker Discrimination - Limits protection for whistleblowers, including protection from being fired in retaliation.
Kansas GOP Overhauling State Labor Laws - Reduces workplace safety standards, limits workers’ compensation
Workforce Democracy and Fairness Act - Ironically named, guts the National Labor Relations Board
In ‘message’ to big business, Maine governor LePage orders labor mural removed - My favorite. A mural depicting gains in worker protections is being removed because it makes employers sad.

They’re doing it now; see post #231 above. Dollars to Dope a lot of that legislation if not all of it was crafted by heavily-corpo-funded ALEC, and proposed by legislators who live in corporate pockets. The anti-Walker backlash, etc., is as good as it gets, right now, and might fail.

Alphabetically? Well, gonna take a while.

Aardvark Holding Company
Aaron Burr Firearm Insurance Co…

Its not necessarily lash and backlash, that’s not how these things are done, they are done not in chomps but in nibbles. An hour of overtime marked as an hour of straight time, nibble. Raising the assembly line pace 5 percent, nibble. You know the drill, anybody who has ever worked knows the drill. And its their drill. You see, Andy, they is the augur and you is the augeree, and they will either augur you a new one or core out the one you already have.

Because they have to! They have to remain competitive, its not like they want to, they do it mournfully and with damp sorrow. The Free Market, blessings and peace be upon its Name, compels them to such hard-nosed decisions! In fact, the ability to make such sternly realistic decisions is why they deserve to make a thousand times the hourly wage of Joe Schmuck. Takes a special kind of person.

But lash, and backlash? Heavens no, thrashing will not be necessary unless morale fails to improve.

Pro-Walker yard signs are gigantic.

Pro-Barrett signs are handmade. (see link)

Blogging about how the state has become divided under Walker:

Ah that explains why pro-Barrett people are stealing Walker signs. Or burning them.

Official statement of renounce, denounce, and condemn. There. Anything else?

Yeah, you have to put that burnt sign back together! [hands elucidator tweezers and glue]

Does Walker smell like sulfur? No need to assume malevolence on the party of the Barrett supporters if so.

The “insert” included a form for parent’s to signand send in to request that their children do not get assigned to those “radical” teachers.

From the link:
"For three decades after World War II – I call it the “Great Prosperity” – wages rose in tandem with productivity. Americans shared the gains of growth, and had enough money to buy what they produced.

That’s largely due to the role of labor unions. "
Really? It wasn’t that we blew up most of the rest of the worlds factories in the war? Labor unions did it. No.