I took the NAUI open water course in 1980. My wife took the PADI open water diver course in 1993.
There really was no comparison. My wife’s course was a weekend of 2 8-hour days, plus an open water exam.
The course material for NAUI including a lot of science and math, centered around gas laws, tank filling procedures, and the use of the U.S. Navy dive tables.
The PADI course just touched on any of the gas laws, taught the use of simplified ‘sport’ dive tables, and overall I’d say covered maybe half the material of the NAUI course.
The NAUI swim requirements were 1 lap of a pool underwater breath holding, 8 laps on the surface, a 4-lap distressed diver tow, having to drop all our snorkelling gear in 12ft of water and dive and and put it on and purge and surface, etc. Fairly stringent. The Open Water included a number of tasks including a long-distance diver tow and a free dive to 30ft. My open water was a full weekend of dives.
My wife’s swim requirements were far lighter. No free dives, no requirement to fetch equipment from the deep end, etc. She elected to do her open water on a holiday in Florida, and was basically just a nice tropical dive. No heavy testing requirements, although they were observed by an instructor who had to certify them as competant.
But I’m not sure if the difference was NAUI vs PADI, or whether it was 1980 vs 1993. When I got my certification, most divers dove on their own, unsupervised. By 1993, the average diver almost never dove without a tour guide and professional boat captain.
So it makes perfect sense that the basic open-water exam would be tailored to that group, and then additional certifications available for people who want to stretch their capabilities.
Anyone else have knowledge of whether PADI or NAUI have watered down their basic courses over the years?