It’s also rather simple to paint carriers as hysterical pants-wetters who can’t pick up their dry cleaning without .45cal backup, and non-carriers as well adjusted folks who can successfully negotiate the line at McDonalds without needing to prepare for a gunfight.
I’m going with Vile Turddrip
I can get behind that. It makes a nice compliment to my rule about people that imitate infants to make their point.
So what’s the rule then on accusing gun-nuts of having tiny penises? I’d just like to make sure I have my notes up to date.
Venial Turdsoup,
Do me, do me!*
5-4-Fighting
- You know what I mean.
Depends… if the idea is they’re carrying a big gun to compensate, you probably don’t want to upset them too much; OTOH, if it’s like what they say about big noses/big fingers; if somebody has a small penis, you could probably soak up a few rounds.
I prefer a tire iron for the line at McDonalds… it’s more viscerally satisfying.
Indeed I do, 5-4-Felching. And thanks for the improved suggestions, Flaccid Lump and… er… Taber. (Damn!)
I agree with his sentiment without necessarily agreeing with his verbiage, let’s say. On the other hand, the thread linked was already pretty heated and he wasn’t really lowering the tone of discourse more than it already was.
Anecdotally, the guys I know who would carry to a bar are the designated driver types who have 0-1 beers while they’re there. I’m just as wary of drunks with guns as with cars, but I’m just as mostly unconcerned about guys who’ve had less than a beer an hour and cars/guns.
Isn’t it just like those crazy, possibly psychotic, small dicked, cowboy wannabe gun fetishists to get all riled up when we try to have a polite, reasoned discussion?
D&R!!
Conversely, there are those of us who understand both “I don’t really need a gun to get through my daily life” and “I look at a concealed firearm like I look at having a spare tire–ideally I’ll never need it, but when you need it you NEED it.”
“I like you, Antinor01. Hell, you can come to my house and fuck my sister.”
What about me, Zeriel? Don’t I get dibs?
I appreciate the sentiment, but Idle Thoughts can have her. 
(Now, if you have a hot brother we might be in business!)
Actually it really does amuse me sometimes how irrational people on both sides get in GD threads about gun control. (well about a bunch of topics, but since this is the one being discussed…) Sometimes you just have to poke fun at it.
He’s hot but he’s married, sorry. The sister is notational anyway. 
It’s heated because both sides are scared of what they rightly think is something to be scared of–guns are dangerous, but having them available is in the constitution for a defendably good reason.
I get mostly pissy when a gun advocate responds to taunting and then gets pitted for it.
It’s the taunting on both sides that amuses me. It’s one of the major signs that no agreement or compromise will be reached.
(Happily married?..ah never mind)
Geezleweez guys, I like to kick and gouge in the mud and the blood and the beer here in The Pit as much as anybody…but this thread is seriously lame. If it was a horse, it’d have to be shot. Now let’s see some real venom, vituperation, and acrimony or I’m just not going to play.
Which is all well and good until something like Virginia Tech happens again and people start wondering how things would have turned out if there were someone who did happen to be carrying and how many lives could have been saved if there had only been, you know, a responsible gun owner around.
Don’t give me that, you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings! Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type makes me puke! You vacuous toffee-nosed malodorous pervert!