Sorry for the delay. Please excuse any typos in the second half of the review, as I’m a drittle lunk.
Division 3
We Do HGH
QB: 4. (76) David Garrard, 6. (116) Kyle Orton, 12. (236) Byron Leftwich
I think Garrard is generally undervalued this year, but Roethlisberger was still on the board, and it’s unlikely he wasn’t a better pick. Orton also is unlikely to justify his draft position. I think Leftwich was a fine value in the 12th, but with two starters already on board you simply didn’t need him. I think a team that spent two of its first six picks on QBs really ought to have a better situation than this. Rank: 3rd.
RB: 1. (5) Matt Forte, 2. (36) Darren McFadden, 3. (45) Ray Rice, 11. (205) Kevin Faulk
Very nice group. I mean, it had better be if you’re gonna go RB-RB-RB, but I think you did about as well as you could have. Rank: 1st.
WR: 5. (85) Bernard Berrian, 8. (156) Justin Gage, 9. (165) Hakeem Nicks, 10. (196) Robert Meachem, 13. (245) Laurent Robinson
This group suffers for your decision to devote so many resources to RB and QB. No one here has any real upside this season, and at least three of these guys have the potential to give you nothing but a few hundred yards and a touchdown or two. Rank: 5th
TE: 7. (125) Dustin Keller
I love it, great pick, great value. Rank: 3rd.
DEF: 14. (276) Washington
For waiting so long to take a DEF, not bad at all.
Overall Divisional Rank: 3rd. Too much value spent on too little firepower at QB means that your WR corps has to do something completely unexpected for you to compete.
Antonican Druids
QB: 4. (69) Matt Ryan, 7. (132) Brett Favre
I’m not terribly high on either of these guys this season, but you’ve got two starters who don’t suck, which gives you a leg up a lot of teams. Rank: 4th.
RB: 1. (12) Brian Westbrook, 3. (52) Marshawn Lynch, 10. (189) Earnest Graham
Not bad, pretty much a boom or bust group. I think I like Sproles instead of Lynch, but whatever. Rank: 3rd.
WR: 2. (29) Marques Colston, 5. (92) Derrick Mason, 9. (172) Darrius Heyward-Bey, 12. (229) Joey Galloway, 13. (252) Amani Toomer
Mason is generally underrated (though maybe still a reach in the 5th), and you should be able to find a passable 3rd WR from the last three. I really like Colston. Rank: 3rd.
TE: 6. (109) Jeremy Shockey, 8. (149) Visanthe Shiancoe
Shockey isn’t going to help you, his spot should have been another body at WR or RB, where you’re a little thin. Shiancoe’s a fine pick (or would be if you hadn’t already drafted Shockey – no one needs two TEs here). Rank: 4th.
DEF: 11. (212) New Orleans, 15. (292) San Francisco
Likewise, no one needs two DEFs, and I don’t like these picks at all – is there any particular reason to think that these two units will be a lot better than they were last year? Because they’ll have to be if they’re going to be useful fantasy options.
Overall Divisional Rank: 4th. If Lynch *and *Graham have bigger roles in their offenses than is likely, and if you can cobble together something decent at DEF, you could compete.
Dante’s Torino
QB: 6. (112) Chad Pennington
Boy oh boy, if there’s one fantasy QB that could use a backup, this is it. I like Chad a lot in the real world, but on a fantasy team his upside is basically adequate, and there a very substantial downside here. Good luck. Rank: 5th.
RB: 1. (9) Chris Johnson, 3. (49) Knowshon Moreno, 8. (152) Justin Fargas, 9. (169) Michael Bush
Very nice top two, and hoping to get a decent RB out of Oakland’s backups is interesting, and not the *worst *plan I’ve ever heard. Probably could’ve gotten Fargas a few rounds later, though. Rank: 2nd.
WR: 2. (32) Anquan Boldin, 4. (72) Roy Williams, 7. (129) Ted Ginn Jr., 10. (192) Greg Camarillo, 11. (209) Antwaan Randle El, 13. (249) Roscoe Parrish
Quite solid. Very low risk with the two starters in passing offenses and all those return yards, and some very decent upside if Ginn and Williams click with their teams this year (and if Boldin stays healthy). Rank: 1st.
TE: 5. (89) Dallas Clark
A good TE, obviously, but this is one of the spots you could have used to get a second (or first) QB. I also think Owen Daniels would have been a significantly better pick. Rank: 2nd.
DEF: 12. (232) Atlanta, 14. (272) Arizona
I guess the pickings were pretty slim by the time you got around to taking DEFs. Given that, this isn’t terrible. Not a great situation anyway.
Overall Divisional Rank: 1st.* That’s a big asterisk. You need Pennington to stay both good and healthy, which could well be less than a 50% proposition.
Unrelated Siblings
QB: 3. (47) Eli Manning, 5. (87) Ben Roethlisberger
Eli with the 47th pick? I’m a Giants fan, and even I think that’s a huge reach. In most leagues he’ll go after Roethlisberger, which means you could’ve gotten him at least 40 picks later. Still, having two good-but-not-great QBs on the roster means you’re well above average at the position. Rank: 1st.
RB: 1. (7) Reggie Bush, 8. (154) Chester Taylor
I’m actually a little more optimistic than most about Bush’s chance to become to a quality feature back, but no matter how you slice it you could’ve gotten a safer bet with the 7th overall pick. Taylor isn’t a bad pick in the 8th, but a 3rd (and preferably a 4th) RB is an absolute necessity. Rank: 5th.
WR: 2. (34) Hines Ward, 4. (74) Devin Hester, 7. (127) Isaac Bruce, 12. (234) Brandon Stokley, 15. (287) Matt Jones
Again, Hines Ward is reach city – a good bet to have a very graceful decline full of productive, 1000/8-type seasons, but nonetheless someone you could have had at least two rounds later (probably). I think the Devin Hester pick is fine, but you need a better 3-4-5 than you’ve got (especially as Matt Jones is unemployed at the moment). Rank: 4th.
TE: 10. (194) Todd Heap, 14. (274) Benjamin Watson
Perfectly acceptable, aside from the fact that that a second drafted TE is unnecessary. Rank: 5th.
DEF: 6. (114) Baltimore, 11. (207) Tampa Bay
I think Baltimore is the best DEF to have, and that they’re even a pretty good value pick at #114. Given that, however, TB is unnecessary.
Overall Divisional Rank: 5th. You’ve only two playable WRs, and (literally) only two playable RBs, both of whom are rather iffy. A pity, because aside from that I think it’s a very strong team. A little bit more depth would go a long way.
Stinkers
QB: 3. (46) Donovan McNabb, 8. (155) Kerry Collins
A solid core. Both players went roughly where they were supposed to, and you got the high-upside/high-variance starter paired with the dependable, low-downside backup. Good job. Rank: 2nd.
RB: 1. (6) DeAngelo Williams, 4. (75) Le’Ron McClain, 13. (246) BenJarvus Green-Ellis
I’m not at all a believe in McClain or BJGE, so I, personally, am not thrilled with this group. That could just be me. Objectively, though, I think you need a 4th RB one way or another with this trio. Rank: 4th.
WR: 2. (35) Greg Jennings, 6. (115) Steve Breaston, 7. (126) Nate Washington, 11. (206) Michael Clayton, 12. (235) Limas Sweed, 14. (275) Shaun McDonald
Jennings is a good value, and Breaston, though very unlikely to repeat his receiving numbers from last year, will benefit enough from his return yards to more than justify being taken in the 6th Round. After that, though there is some upside in the remainder of the group, the most likely scenario is that you’ll be scrambling to attain mediocrity. Rank: 2nd.
TE: 5. (86) Greg Olsen, 15. (286) Donald Lee
Olson is fine in the 5th, and overall a very dependable TE, though another RB would have been better. No need for Lee, but it’s your 15th Rounder, so whatever. Rank: 1st.
DEF: 9. (166) New York Jets
I, personally, don’t see what separates them from other DEFs taken 1 or two rounds later, but in general this fine.
Overall Divisional Rank: 2nd. It’s all about McClain and Green-Ellis. If I’m wrong about their being mostly useless, than I’m wrong about your not being the best team in the division.