I thought this wine was a real gem.
I picked it up a few days ago for just under $10 at the Toad Hollow tasting room.
When I opened it today, I realized it is not a Blanquette de Limoux as I had stated earlier, but a Blanquette Methode Ancestrale (just like it says on the website and the info sheet the tasting room staff gave me. :smack: )
While the two are similar, there are differences in how they are vinted and what grapes are used; the former allows up to 10% of Chenin Blanc and/or Chardonnay while the latter is 100% Mauzac (the name Blanquette comes from a white [blanc] film that grows on the underside of the leaves of the Mauzac vine.) Mauzac is the main grape varietal grown in the Limoux region.
The traditional method (which is how Blanquette de Limoux is made) of producing Champagne/sparkling wines involves adding additional yeast and sugar to a base wine in bottle, creating a second fermentation; capturing the CO2 given off in bottle (bubbles), then disgorging the dead yeast cells and topping off the bottles with a ‘dosage’ of sugar and wine.
Blanquette Methode Ancestrale is different in that the original fermentation is stopped by cooling the tanks of wine. It’s bottled while cold and then when it later warms up, the fermentation will continue in the bottles.
There is a tradition that is still upheld which I thought was pretty interesting - the partially fermented must (it’s allowed to reach about 5% alc. before chilled) is bottled during the full moon of the month of March. When the temp. of the bottled wine rises (spring time), the initial fermentation will begin again, trapping CO2, creating bubbles and elevating the alcohol level to 6 or 7%. The result is a fairly sweet, low alcohol, sparkling wine.
This is all most likely controlled by the winery now, but it is something that used to happen naturally during the cool winters and warm springs of the Limoux region of France. There is no addition of yeast or sugar. Pretty interesting.
Well, now that I geeked out on that, I’ll get to my notes.
As far as aromas, I definitely picked up candied pears, green grapes, green apples, orange rind, and a hint of something biscuity - kind of like those oblong, roundish teething biscuits my kids used to chew on way back when.
The taste was wonderful - nice texture, nice bubbles. Crisp at first, then rounding out smoothly with that sweetness. Not cloyingly sweet at all, this wine is definitely as described, lively and fun. I picked up more apple, apricot, and hazelnut cookie.
It had an amazingly long finish of dried apple slices, which lingered and mingled with each new sip I took, making it seem more like a sweet, hard apple cider to me.
After my initial tastings I paired it with a ‘ghetto trifle’ - angel food cake, some mixed berries, Cointreau, custard, apricot preserves, Cool Whip. The two played perfectly together. And I got to have dessert for dinner. 
This was a treat, and one that I am certain I will buy again. That apple cider quality has convinced me that it will be a regular addition to my Thanksgiving table, knocking the jug of fresh apple cider off the table for good.
Thanks! (Also, I hope you guys don’t mind if I go off on wine history and whatnot like this from time to time. It’s good for me to write stuff like this out, I think it will help me retain the info.)
Of course, at 6% alc., it’s just not going to cut it for a Friday night, especially after this crazy week. Time to open a Zinfandel!