Well, with all due respect, I have asked several times, pleading each time, honestly, that I do NOT understand. So it is not really fair for you to say I do know when I don’t. Unless you are a better version of me, which I suppose is possible
With all seriousness, since this whole pitting seems to revolve around what was said in a particular thread by [****], why now jump in as we approach the end of page 6?
Also, how is the message you warned me for different in substance than post 279? (bolding mine)
This is not a debate, it is the Pit, the mighty mighty Pit goddammit!
And I agree in the sense that if I were to have to submit a summary, the thread itself would be a very raw draft. But so what, it is the nature of these boards, kind of a collaborative conversation. When they go on, they can lose a sense of coherence. But we love 'em anyway
No, you weren’t trying to see if it was my conclusion, because I was not the poster to whom you directed that query. CarnalK was the poster to whom you addressed that amazing statement/“query”. Consider me one of the color guys.
Carry on. Your hole is not quite deep enough.
Then consider “your” to be plural. You all strike me as parrots working as a team right now anyway.
Truth is, 7 pages in, no one can say which mysterious post is the one that is substantively like the others that Giraffe listed. You are all full of it, and you can go on for 100 more pages if you like, but you only are acting like asses insisting you see something that isn’t there.
Must be fun to be popular I guess, but that popular <> right.
That is what I think about each and every one of you, and some of you have pretty much admitted to the trolling part of it at least.
But feel free to pull the missing quote out of Giraffe’s list - it seems to be a fun game for your type - it has kept you all busy for 7 pages now the same way tossing a puzzle toy to my dogs keeps them busy trying to find the treats.
And it is fun for me to watch you all go off, one by one, insisting you will bring it back, and then getting all in a huff when I ask you to show it to us all
Really, can one of you do that trick again please?
We have so much to look forward to worldwide at the first inaugural Winter Recreational Outrage contest in the upcoming Vancouver Olympics! Just a few short days ago, who among us could have expected the intensity of the performers? We have not seen anything like it since the Israeli Luge team in 1984!
It’s quite fun, actually. We get all the best grass to graze on, and our large numbers help protect us from predators. What’s it like to go against the herd without thinking?
Because it’s very simple and straightforward, and you seem to be the only person that doesn’t get it. I’ll try explaining one more time:
We have told Cesario not to find ways to drag pedophilia into every thread he participates in, and find something else to talk about. To make this fair, everyone else was told to stop baiting him, mentioning his name in pedophilia discussions, and quoting things he said before Ed Zotti’s ruling.
As I said, it’s really quite simple.
It’s only page 2 for me. You also don’t seem to grasp that the number of pages in a thread varies depending on who is looking at it. It’s a setting in your user CP.
Hmmm. Missed that one. CarnalK, you cut it out, too.
