One thing I’ve gathered from perusing CF is that the majority of people here think Twilight is Very Very Bad. Just about everything on Stephanie Meyers here is about how sparkly vampires are stupid, Bella and Edward’s relationship is unhealthy, the plot is horrible, sparkly vampires are stupid, etc.
Thus, I’ve come to the natural conclusion that Twilight must be as bad as they say.
So I come across people, IRL and on other message boards who have discuss Twilight. And I feel an urge to go on about how it’s such a terrible book, and they shouldn’t read it. (Especially on the Barnes&Noble message board, Twilight is considered a Great Book, and is often compared to Harry Potter).
Thing is, I haven’t actually read Twilight myself. I’m just not into vampires.
Another thing is that some books I’ve liked have just a thoroughly been dissed in cyberspace. I think one or two people here actually defended Twilight, which is more than I can say for Eragon. My point is, I liked Eragon and The DaVinci Code, so who am I to tell others that Twilight is bad?
On the other hand, the plot summeries I’ve seen do sound truely awful.
I’d say it’s best to restrain yourself when it comes to going on about how awful something is that you’ve never read. You’re certainly free to say that Twilight SOUNDS awful, that people who’ve read it have told you it’s awful, and that specific details you’ve heard sound awful as well, but if you haven’t read it then your opinion isn’t worth much. It’s pretty pretentious to make a big deal about how terrible a book is based solely on what you’ve heard. And what if one of the book’s fans asks if you’ve actually read it? She might (reasonably) argue that you’re just prejudiced against the book, and (less reasonably) that no one who’d really read the book would say it was bad.
As for me, I’ve read about half of Twilight and I’ll admit that was largely out of spite – I WANTED to be able to say with authority that it was really as bad as it sounds. It was a borrowed copy and I didn’t have time to finish the whole thing, otherwise I probably would have forced through to the end. Maybe I’ll do it someday, but I’m not in a hurry. It really IS that bad, the first half at least, and since the existence of sequels indicates that it doesn’t conclude in the same way as Bonnie & Clyde then I know there’s no way the ending could redeem it in my mind.
Anyway, if you want to denounce Twilight, you’ve got to pay the price the same as I did.
To be really honest, I can’t comprehend why you would even want to. Why do you care what other people enjoy and what makes you believe your opinion is important enough to make fun of someone else’s taste?
Is it a feeling of superiority? Just wanting to be combative? Do you believe it makes you seem more intelligent? Help me understand the need to be so critical of something that brings other people pleasure.
I think Lamia is right on this; you have to read the book before you express a negative opinion.
That said, I read it - well, sort of, I got bored and just skimmed through quickly figuring out what happened. Then I hit up my daughter, who’s read all of the series so far and loves them, to find out what happened in the rest of the series.
I thought the plot was intriguing, though extremely far-fetched (not so much the vampires part as much as the idea that the human girl wouldn’t run fast and far, to name just part of what I found hard to swallow). But the reason I got bored is that there are only so many breathless descriptions of how beautiful, how gorgeous, how wonderful-smelling each finds the other that I could stand to read. Although it did create a new family joke when I did a dinnertime performance of the book to satisfy my son’s curiosity (he heard it was bad, too).
I was curious enough to want to know how it ends, but not enough to read every single word. Or page.
I’d have had plenty of time to finish it if Meyer had left out all the descriptions of how perfect and wonderful Edward was. It probably would have been more a short story than a novel!
I also found the protagonist totally unsympathetic. I have never read a book with a main character that I found less likable than Bella, and I’ve read Crime and Punishment, A Clockwork Orange, and even Mansfield Park. I was totally rooting for the truck.
It’s fine to say that you haven’t read it because you think it is a horrible book and unlikely to be to your taste. And it’s fine to preach the virtues of classic literature. But to denounce a book on a message board at length because you believe it to be horrible and there are websites filled with fans–don’t. What’s the point? The true believers won’t be dissuaded or persuaded to try your suggestions of better pieces of work. The not so true believers already know about the flaws. But what do you want to accomplish by dissing a book you’ve never read?
I read every word of Atlas Shrugged and every page of The Da Vinci Code so I could pronounce with authority that they were absolute shit. Maybe you should do the same, or maybe I just didn’t see the shortcut.