of the 911 report, which prove that Bush knew all about the MASSIVE Saudi Arabian involvement in 911 and the Bush family’s deep economic ties to Saudi Arabia, etc, Obama is going to wait until the Republicans have stupidly put all their weight behind Jeb Bush and then torpedo him right before the general election. Let’s get the info out into the open, so the Republicans KNOW not to nominate Bush.
So long as no other laws are being broken – e.g. refusing to respond to FOIA lawsuits – then politically advantageous timing of the release of official documents is filthy…but legal.
Expect Benghazi hearings to continue through the campaign, targeted at Clinton.
It’s no game for little children…
If the pages haven’t been released, how do you know what they “prove”?
Because, just like science, facts mean absolutely nothing to the truthers.
Maybe all the good stuff is covered by “etc.”
If you know the contents, why don’t you post them here for us now?
They’re uffel.
Obama has pages? I thought that was a congressional thing. Especially the locking up and presumably sexually harassing them, which I gather is being implied.
Jeb Bush is behind 9/11?
etc.
I assume the OP is talking about this. It’s not clear to me what this has to do with Jeb Bush, who was not President during the 90s. (That would be someone with the same last name as someone *else *who is running for President).
But we should certainly follow the story to see if the allegations of a convicted terrorist with mental issues, no evidence, and nothing to lose, have any traction in the Presidential race. I’m guessing they won’t, but that’s probably just me.
Regards,
Shodan
For those not knowing what the OP is going on about (I was one of them), the “28 pages” apparently refers to something described in this article:
The redacted pages were not associated with what is commonly referred to as the “9/11 Commission Report” but a separate Congressional investigation into the attacks entitled “The Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001” and issued in December 2002.
Apparently some members of Congress who have seen the classified pages say that they suggest, among other things, the Saudi government had more detailed information about the planning and timing of the attacks than they let on to the US government.
Now that I wouldn’t doubt. Given that 15 of the hijackers (if memory serves correctly) were Saudis, it is not that big a conclusion to draw.
Is ufel a Truther? The OP indicates he thinks the Saudis were responsible for 9/11, which a Truther wouldn’t say.
How would Obama have control over the redaction and/or release of Congressional documents?
A Truther can(and will) say many contradictory things. A Truther can believe that The Government can create a vast yet supersecret conspiracy to bring down the World Trade Centers, yet seems incapable of stopping people from exposing their supersecret conspiracy on the internet. Believing that our own government brought the towers down while at the same time believing that our own government conspired to spirit the Saudis out of the country can be explained by saying that if they had testified the conspiracy would have been found out.
Not sure myself, but the linked article makes it clear that the decision to release (or not) the redacted information is under the control of the White House.
Can you quote that part? I can’t see it without subscribing.
nor No Country for Old Women.
Because some of the simpler minded voters would not vote for Bush.