Fuck, man, I don’t know how to come back from that level of witty repartee.
Bullshit, you disingenuous little turd.
…good grief man get over it. I had no idea you were this precious.
Said the guy who can’t bear to look at a hunting photo.
I’m not the one getting all worked up because someone smiled in a photograph.
…I’ve looked at plenty of hunting photos. What the hell are you talking about?
[QUOTE=Miller]
I’m not the one getting all worked up because someone smiled in a photograph.
[/QUOTE]
I never got worked up dude. You posted something stupid, I posted an analogy in response, and you’ve turned into a frothing blithering idiot. Whom I suspect still doesn’t get my point.
The only point you have is the one on your head.
Oh, yeah. You’re an ocean of calm.
If you can’t tell the difference between shooting an animal, and killing another human being in a war zone, you are, by definition, the stupidest person in the conversation.
In a lot of those photos she’s obviously done her hair and makeup and put on earrings between the kill and the photo shoot. My daughter’s FB page is loaded with pictures of her holding up her catches on the river, and dolled up to go out, but I don’t know what I’d think if her getup were combo’d. And that would just be fish; catch and release at that. But using a big dead mammal as a fashion accessory?
Also, twenty five years ago when I worked at Kinko’s, we had to run a bunch of “menus” for professional hunters when a big game convention was in town (white Africans are really assholes to people in service jobs - surprise surprise). The cost to shoot even an antelope was thousands of dollars. If she really wanted to feed hungry natives for the most value, she could have flown in a giraffe herd worth of White Castle.
People are free to hunt and make bad jokes and keep pics of their junk in the Cloud, but still, they should own their shit.
…BWA HA HA! What a hilarious shot at me! Oh hold on, no, it was pretty lame.
[QUOTE=Miller]
Oh, yeah. You’re an ocean of calm.
[/QUOTE]
I am actually. I’m glad you can at least acknowledge that.
Of course I can tell the difference. Can you point out what part of what I’ve written leads you to believe I literally can’t see the difference?
Do you know what an analogy is?
But lest we hijack this thread any further I’ll bow out.
Sarcasm, dipshit.
The part where you tried to make an analogy between the two things.
Yes. It’s where you try to illustrate an argument by highlighting similarities in the situation under discussion, with a different situation. The problem is, it only works if the two things you’re comparing are actually similar. The fact that you thought these two situations were sufficiently similar to serve as a useful analogy is how I know you’re a moron.
Yeah, that’ll last.
Ricky Gervais is not a ‘fat bastard’. He used to be a fat bastard, but got himself a trainer and started eating right, so he’s actually pretty fit at this point.
“Fit bastard” doesn’t have quite the same ring to it, though.
Maybe it was a typo.
Cruel, I tell you! Now you’re suggesting they don’t have companionship? Why, next you’ll tell me that they don’t laugh, or cry, or solve complex differential equations.
(In case the sarcasm remains opaque: yes, I know that).
I don’t really care about the giraffe. But what a stupid, patronizing, condescending story.
If you are a hunter who likes to post glamour shots with corpses, that’s whatever. If that’s your thing-- and it’s clearly her thing-- own it. Don’t make up some ridiculous story about it.
Maybe it’s me, since this is the 2nd thread I’m not catching on to tonight, but why fuck Ricky Gervais? Why not fuck the horde? Fuck Twitter? The man, wisely or not, posted this picture. And the crowd! Goes! Wild! Yeah, fuck Facebook and fuck Twitter, but I can’t blame the man for posting something he thought needed attention. Even celebrities don’t know when it’s gonna go viral.
Because of posts like:
A lot of people are suggesting that the animals are owed respect. I have pretty conflicting feelings about animal welfare and animal rights–although I’ve got a mouthful of beefy enchilada right now, I wouldn’t be surprised if future generations consider that to be an atrocity–but among my conflicting feelings, I’m absolutely convinced that showing respect to animals is a total irrelevancy. Kill them or don’t kill them, that makes a real difference. But respect them or don’t respect them once you’ve killed them? That’s total anthropomorphism.
Doesn’t really matter to me. What matters is “kills.” If someone’s going to kill an animal anyway, they may as well enjoy it. Weeping for the oyster–excuse me, giraffe–and deeply sympathizing makes no difference compared to posing next to it for a selfie.
It is interesting to me that of all the hunters in the world who post selfies next to their prey, the one that Ricky Gervais tweets about is one of the few hunters that’s a woman. Is it really that hard to find a dude who’s next to his prey? What are the percentages?
Why don’t you quote the rest of the post where he explains what he meant? And with all your shit about fighting ignorance, don’t you deal with the experts saying her story is improbable?
You have a problem where “fighting ignorance” means getting everyone to agree with you. Someone voiced a fucking opinion about a situation and you alleged they were being ignorant, as if the story from this woman that you want to believe is scientific fact.
The fact remains that a lot of people find the enjoyment at killing to be reprehensible. It’s not like our lizard brains differentiate via species. It’s been shown that people who enjoy crushing bugs will also volunteer to do things that hurt their fellow human beings.
I have met hunters that hunt with a great reverence for life. But I’ve met others that have a sort of glee at being able to go around killing things. And the smile this woman has looks a lot more like the latter.
That’s my OPINION. It doesn’t matter. There are no scientific facts being disputed here. This is not remotely the same as the other shit you brought up. And I’m not such a shitty person that I wouldn’t give her a chance if I met her in person. If I find out I’m wrong about her, fine.
It’s not like any of that other shit, where people are trying to have their own facts. It’s just my opinion of her character based on what I know now. It doesn’t matter to me one bit why you kill if you actually viscerally enjoy the act of killing.
Interesting how the thread became about the moral justification of the hunter, as opposed to that of those engaging in online threats, doxxing, etc. against her or about the OP’s denunciation of the online shaming culture.
I want to believe it’s because we all agree that whatever her faults, seeking to exact that level of “punishment” against her is something we repudiate, we are agreed that those who do so are asshats, the online shaming culture is bullshit [at least when applied to private citizens], and we may move on to debating if what she did was prudent.
But that’s the thing: does it rise to the level of awfulness that calls for an online campaign to make her pay for her sins with IRL threats? Or are the participants of the online pile-on just themselves being trolls and insufferable “like”-clickwhores?
In general, the scheme under which:
[ol]
[li]Person who is not a public figure makes a stupid trolling post on the networks.[/li]
[li]Someone gets offended and makes a point to spread and whip up Recreational Outrage[/li]
[li]The Internet sentences the person to threats of violence, revelation of realworld contact information, demands that employers and associates act, etc.[/li][/ol]
…is something I don’t particularly like as the new normal.