Well, with a seventeen-year age gap, it would have been impossible for my sister and I to be treated equally. However, I don’t think that’s an excuse for treating me like a second-class citizen.
Really, man. I didn’t expect to be able to sit and drink with them at age eleven, but in my own house, a blood relative, I shouldn’t have had to live with the (unspoken but clear and uncontestable) edict, “Don’t talk to us; just get what you have to get from the kitchen and leave. Stay in your room, play outside, or fly to the moon; we don’t care, just do it away from us.”
The thing is, because I had been conditioned to think that adults were always right, the logical conclusion was that if they didn’t want me to talk to them or in any way associate with them, they must have a good reason for feeling that way. If I wanted to contribute to the conversation and my sister wheeled on me and brayed “IS THIS GONNA TAKE LONG?!”, that had to be what I deserved.
And I know this was the early '80s, and people didn’t think about stuff like developing social skills. And I also realize that it wasn’t their job to teach me superlative social skills, but they could not have given me a worse preparation for middle school. At that age, there’s a lot of drama, and the girls who emerge as the queen bee and her court are the ones best able to handle conflict. So, since my conditioned reaction to conflict was, “I’m sorry!..You’re not mad at me, are you? Please don’t be mad at me! :::tears:::” I might as well have dumped the pig’s blood on my head myself.
If my mom and sister could have stifled their revulsion for my pubescent self and let me contribute my perfectly on-topic remarks, or, if I wasn’t on topic, said, NICELY, “We’re kinda busy right now, but tell us about it later,” it would have made a world of difference. Instead, they acted as if any room they were in had only them in it, and I was expected to act accordingly.
It had to be the alcohol. If my mom had been thinking straight, she might have taken into account both her experience: oldest of 6; their parents went to great lengths not to play favorites, during the Depression and WWII, no less. AND my dad’s experience: his mother, for reasons that will never be known, since she’s dead, blatantly favored my uncle over my dad, in ways that echo many posts in this thread. And my mom was aware of how this affected him. But she shunned me anyway, and sat there and let my adult sister act like a bratty teenager towards me. (Funny thing is, when I was 16, my mom decided I was old enough to drink with them. So I was okay all of a sudden. Woohoo.)
Large Marge, is that always true, that parents favor the “easy” child? I’ve gathered from other people that it’s very often the opposite: the needy, “problem” child gets more attention in an attempt to “fix” hir. I know that in my own family, at various points on the timeline, my sisters and I were each cast in the role of “identified patient”. Just my bad luck, I guess, that I was at my most vulnerable stage of development when Marcia was identified.
Also, I recall a recent thread about only children and whether they’re okay with their status. Many onlies responded that they were glad of it, because “I wouldn’t have wanted siblings to fight with!” But when I started a thread asking Dopers with siblings if they regretted having them, most people replied that they’d had their conflicts, but when everything shook out, they wouldn’t trade their siblings for all the only-child privileges in the world. The only people who replied in the affirmative were the ones who had clinically dysfunctional experiences. So it doesn’t have to suck, but unfortunately, for some, it does.