*sigh* Obama is not a "racist" (and neither is Rev. Wright, really)

He did not say that. That’s just your interpretation of his words,a nd it’s an interpretation (as I’ve pointed out) which is contraindicated by the rest of his words.

This is a ridiculous angle. He forcefully said “no, no no” when asked if he’d ever heard Obama express any of those same sentiments. He gave no indicationm that he thought Obama agreed with any of it. If he says he never heard Obama say anything like that, then the assumption is that he doesn’t think that way. It’s ridicu;ous to say that a person should have to explicitly deny a given sentiment in order to assume he doesn’t hold it.

Rev. Wright has been all over the news trying to vindicate his reputation. And you can’t blame him one bit since he was completely misunderstood. But I seriously wish he would stfu until after the election. I just don’t want anything to get in the way of Obama’s campaign. He doesn’t need any more major obstacles like this right now.

Damn…

Why would Wright go out of his way to say that Obama disagrees with him? I mean, he sees himself as speaking the truth, not spreading crazy lies, so I’m not surprised that he doesn’t want to portray Obama’s beliefs as being in conflict with his. By expecting him to make statements that show Obama has taken an active view against him means you’re expecting him to tear his own crediblity apart as a way of defending Obama. It also means expecting the man to be able to parse, spin, and do damage control as well as a politician can, which ironically, is exactly what he’s saying you shouldn’t do.

His calling Obama a “politician” I interpret to mean that Obama’s job is to talk about and deal in politics, as a government agent. The pastor’s job is to be a pastor, and as such he is afforded the creative license to free-style on any and all topics that can be neatly linked to a Bible passage in the course of an hour or two, including the government. Not everyone uses the word “politician” to mean “someone who says whatever it takes to get elected”. And even if he is, the man has little credibility so what does it matter what he thinks Obama is?

There are two different issues here:

  1. Does Obama hold the same views as Wright.
  2. Was Obama sincere when he denounced certain statement Wright made.

I am not arguing that the answer to #1 is “yes”, nor am I saying that Wright even knows what the answer to that is. I’m just arguing that Wright cast doubt on the sincerity of what Obama said. HE IS NOT HELPING OBAMA OUT BY KEEPING HIMSELF IN THE SPOTLIGHT. But, if he feels that he personally needs to defend himself, he should go ahead and do that. He’s not obligated to put his own personal needs behind those of Obama.

In the context he used it he clearly implies whatever it takes to get elected:
Wright implied Obama still agrees with him by saying: “He had to distance himself, because he’s a politician, from what the media was saying I had said, which was [portrayed as] anti-American.”

I agree the man has little credibility. He’s an urban hillbilly who flings racially insensitive drivel at his congregation. The man is supposed to guide and inspire people. Obama put Wright on his social resume claiming him as a 20 year mentor. If he has little credibility then why would someone who wanted to be President of the United States sign on to the racially insensitive bandwagon of the Reverend Wrong.

Obama never denounced specified statements made by Wright. He ducked the issue entirely by saying he was aware that racially insensitive statements were made.

Yes he did.

Utterly false.

What did Wright say that was “racially insenitive?”

Another poster who’d like to see an actual racist quote by Wright.

You tell me, those were the words HE (Obama) used. And show me where he listed the statements he disagreed with.

Since the truth of this statement is indipustable, why is this worth gasping over? I think it’s unreasonable to expect Wright to marginalize himself by saying that Obama doesn’t agree with his rhetoric. Would you expect Hagee, in an interview about his Katrina remarks, to emphasize that McCain thinks those ideas as expressed were inappropriate and offensive? I wouldn’t. I would expect Hagee to come as close as he can to saying McCain agrees with him, without being so bold as to say that. It’s called self-preservation. And anyone who would use that as evidence of what McCain actually believes would be foolish.

Didn’t say racist, I said racially insensitive.

Actually, Wright – and this appears to be the very thing some find objectionable about him – is extraordinarily racially sensitive, i.e., sensitive to the problems of racism as, perhaps, only an AA can be. From the Moyers interview:

Where’s the racial insensitivity in that?!

Now, I admit Wright is flat wrong in assuming that “Africanity” has any relevance to African-Americans. African-Americans are not Africans in America. Their culture owes much more to Europe than Africa and any one of them would feel more at home in Copenhagen than Kinshasa; and, beyond a shared history of oppression, they really have little in common with Afro-Caribbeans or Afro-Latinos. But he’s spot-on otherwise.

Obama didn’t say they were racist (or racially insensitive).

This is why this discussion is pointless.

Apparently “black” isn’t a race, and Christianity isn’t a theology.

Well, there’s glory for you.

Regards,
Shodan

:confused:

I myself am unashamedly white. Also, I am unapologetically christian.*

Do I have a race based theology, then?! :eek:

-FrL-

*…well… I coulda been anyway. Depends on what you mean by “apologetic.”

Yes, if you define yourself that way, you do.

Unless white is black.

Regards,
Shodan

Gee, I wonder if Reverend Wright said anything after the short sentence you quoted: “No, it’s not”. Like something that might justify the answer he gave, and maybe even made a lot of sense. I guess we’ll never know.

Oh, he said a lot. Talking your way into black-means-white usually takes a lot of time.

Regards,
Shodan

Geez, you’d think it was Wright himself who is running for President. The press is really playing this up as Obama = Wright, unless he can prove otherwise. I am so ridiculously fed up with this “issue”. Isn’t there a war? Isn’t rhere a credit crisi? Isn’t the country slipping into recession? Health care, anyone? This is driving me crazy, what is supposed to happen here. I mean the press talk about this Reverend Wright thing, woithout really ever saying what the issue is. It seems to boil donw to, “Obama has a problem” and “Obama needs to explain this”. It is sad, because I beleive the real question they want to ask is, “You are a angry black man, with angry black friends, please make us white folks feel comfortable that you aren’t really angry.”