[QUOTE=Two and a Half Inches of Fun]
To start with the whole right brain/left brain thing:
Has Dr. Hale’s research been confirmed? Her results go against the general consensus that there is not not a fundamental difference in neurological function between white people and black people (which is an imprecise and arbitrary biological classification for humans.)
[/QUOTE]
Even if you don’t agree with the research it’s hardly racially insensitive is it? He may be right or wrong to accept it as a fact but how is it racially insensitive?
[QUOTE=cosmosdan]
Even if you don’t agree with the research it’s hardly racially insensitive is it? He may be right or wrong to accept it as a fact but how is it racially insensitive?
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Diogenes the Cynic]
Has it been refuted? What qualifies you to say that it’s bullshit? Even if her conclusions prove inaccurate, how does it make Wright a racist for believing it?
[/QUOTE]
It goes against the general consensus there is no fundamental difference in neurological function between white people and black people. You can look at all the research that has been presented to refute the racist The Bell Curve by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray.
[QUOTE=Two and a Half Inches of Fun]
It goes against the general consensus there is no fundamental difference in neurological function between white people and black people. You can look at all the research that has been presented to refute the racist The Bell Curve by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray.
[/QUOTE]
It looks to me like she’s saying the differences are cultural, not physiological, but she knows more tham either one of us so neither of us is qualified to assert that it’s “bullshit,” and even if itwere, there’s nothing racist about Wright believing it.
Actually, re-reading the quote from Wright, I think he is talking about cultural differences. Throwing in the right brain/left brain stuff makes it sound biological, and I think he is out of his area of expertise in talking about that subject.
I saw some more clips of him on the news tonight. Man, Hillary couldn’t have dreamed up a better way of damaging Obama…
It’s so obviously racist it’s not even funny.
As in literally, not funny.
And, if you can’t see that, as well as see DTC’s hilarious statement that it might explain why blacks are better at music as so thoroughly to-the-bone racist it’s also not funny, at all, well, there’s no hope.
I knew that before I rejoined this place, but I’m pretty shocked at just how bad it’s gotten around here. Yeesh.
[QUOTE=John Mace]
I haven’t seen that at all.
Well, the “issue” would’ve died down if the Reverend himself hadn’t put himself back in the spotlight. But I’d also add that folks here seem to be more interested in discussing this than the press does.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe the issue would have died, maybe not. I am not sure if you watch much cable news, John, but the Reverend Wright controversy has dominated the news cycles for approximatley seven weeks now. We are talking about it on the board because it is a continuous topic in the media.
I’m still waiting for an explanation as to why it’s racist. Just declaring it to be racist, over and over again, is not a persuasive argument.
I guess a lot of white people just desperately need to feel persecuted, though, so there’s no talking to some of them.
And black people ARE better at music than white people. That’s just a fact. If it wasn’t for Black Americans, white Americans would still have nothing but their imbecillic jug music.
[QUOTE=Diogenes the Cynic]
I’m still waiting for an explanation as to why it’s racist. Just declaring it to be racist, over and over again, is not a persuasive argument.
I guess a lot of white people just desperately need to feel persecuted, though, so there’s no talking to some of them.
And black people ARE better at music than white people. That’s just a fact. If it wasn’t for Black Americans, white Americans would still have nothing but their imbecillic jug music.
[/QUOTE]
Well, as long as we’re on the subject, think of it the way Louie Armstrong referred to jazz: “If you don’t know, I can’t explain it to you.”
Really, you’re old enough to know better. Or so I thought.
Also, I’m not white.
[QUOTE=Diogenes the Cynic]
I’m still waiting for an explanation as to why it’s racist. Just declaring it to be racist, over and over again, is not a persuasive argument.
[/QUOTE]
Wright is saying that white people are superior at logical thinking and that blacks are superior at creative thinking. He is making claims about the superiority of people on the basis of racial classification.
Not buying that, however. If “Black” can be an ethnic group, then “White” can, too. I think I represent a lot of White people who aren’t particularly associated with any Old World ethnic group. I’m a White American guy, and I probably share a lot in common with other White American guys. If Blacks from NYC, the rural south, and LA are connected in some meaningful way, then White are, too. We all are connected in various levels of subcultures.
[/QUOTE]
Well, I think it is easy to get hung up on semantics. Black is used interchangeably with African American. Clearly, there is an African American ethnicity. The white American culture is a blend of multiple European ethnicities, and the greater American culture is a blend of all ethnic groups.