I like to use “credophile”.
A and E.
I like to use “credophile”.
A and E.
I like Ivan. He cracks me up. He may be a bit mental sometimes, but who cares? He makes the boards more fun.
Yeah, your aloof, devil-may-care maturity is what makes you lash out aggressively and childishly at others who are simply attempting to engage you in meaningful dialog.
You really are a paragon of disinterested sophistication.
Sheesh. :rolleyes:
All I know is I miss VC03.
No cashews or pecans, just plain nuts.
So after 'bout 3 hours, the count stands as follows (excluding my own vote, and ivan’s, and abstentions like those of Autolycus, above):
18 votes for “full of shit”, or some permutation thereof (criticisms)
8 defenses of one sort or another
4 votes for “troll” *
So, 22 negative assessments, 8 reasonably favorable votes.
*Note that votes of both “A.” and “E. troll” were not counted twice; I recorded them only as A votes.
Seems that so far, 73% of us think you’re just full of it, ivan. Remember, you’re the one who asked!
Cautionary disclaimer:
We all know that popularity of an idea, does not its truth establish.
None of this proves anything at all about ivan astikov, of course. But he suggested a poll on the matter, so I obliged.
8 “favourables” out of 30! I’m quite happy with that score if you’re sure that’s a representative sample?
Hey, astikov, remember: You said you’d fuck off if 50 of us went on record as believing you are full of fucking shit. Don’t forget that.
You’re happy with a 27% favorable review? :eek:
Now I don’t know which is the more appalling: your grasp of percentages or your argumentative abilities.
Re: a “representative sample”: Why don’t you post a poll on a true believer board, and when they hail you as Visionary, come back and trumpet those results here? That would be more balanced, I’m sure.
@ **MTCicero
**
Are you getting a bit excited now? Why don’t you get a banner ad and see if you can drum up support?
The irony is that most posters in this thread are proving mr astikov correct 
Full of shit? Oh yes, of course, thats quite apparent. Lords yes.
A. and E. (where, coincidentally, Ivan spends a lot of saturday nights)
Compared to these guys, he should be estatic.
Ain’t saying much though. Let me add another “A” to the E-peener, just to get him a little closer to those other guys.
Take that back! I’ve been once in the last 5 years, and that was on a Thursday afternoon. :mad:
For the record despite the opinions I posted of him, I’m not advocating trying to get rid of Ivan. Indeed I wish he would engage more in his beliefs. It could make an interesting discourse if he were a little more mature.
Indeed. In reading through his pitting of xt (the thread referenced in my OP here), I was actually looking forward to a fascinating debate. But he wouldn’t let even that happen. ![]()
If you take someone to the mat for something, why wouldn’t they be mad at you? Is that not the point? If you wanted them to actually take it as constructive criticism, wouldn’t you actually phrase it as such?
And, yes, I realize the implications of that statement.
eh, not really feeling it for Ivan as troll de jour. Stupid, insane? Not even close - although he does come across as uneducated. Guess things are slow and he’s filling a gap. Even his trolling seems rudimentary by the standards of past legends.
Saying that, when you can get a nine page fail thread going on the basis of a one liner, plus attendant satellite thread - then I guess you know the ropes of trolling.
Agreed.
But the rub seems to be what I’ve bolded above. At any rate, you are quite right about the entertainment factor.
So, astikov: You can stay. It’ll be fun to have a dancing monkey around to sort of check in on once in a while for a laugh. Carry on, good chap.