I saw him on Larry King tonight. While he didn’t say, “Yes, I’m the father,” he didn’t exactly deny it either. When Larry asked him about it, he at first said he wasn’t interested in answering the question. Then after Larry pressed him a little bit he said something like, “Well, I’ll say no, if that’s what you want me to say.” And finally he acknowledged that though unlikely, it is possible.
And I have to tell you, those kids do bear more than a passing resemblence to him. They certainly look more like him than they do any member of the Jackson clan.
Not after seeing this picture. The youngest “Blanket”, definitely looks like Michael when he was a kid.
I don’t see it. He had a rounded face and a very wide nose.
I tend to agree. Blanket actually looks like a tiny “modern day” Michael. Mostly because of his hair style and light mocha skin. “Modern day” Michael does not really look like “Genetic” Michael at all.
He does have beautiful eyes, though.
Yes.
You could just be overlooking the simplest explanation, which is that Lamarck was right
Who the hell knows. And is it really that important? I mean, his kids are going through enough… now this? I feel bad for them. They didn’t ask to be born into this circus.
I think that if Jackson didn’t use his own sperm, unless there was a medical reason not to, it’s a real shame.
I’ll be the first to admit I’d like to know if Jackson and Rowe are biologically the parents, but it’s more idle curiosity and I do realize it’s no one’s business in reality.
Still I think that if Jackson didn’t use his own sperm and purposely selected a “lighter” color it sparks a whole new discussion. But that would be in a different forum
Blanket looks so much like Michael Jackson - sure looks like he could be be his son.
In fact, looking at the eldest daughter (Paris) and the middle son, it seems possible that these are his children also.
But, who cares. From the little I have seen from the “Memorial Service”, the children see him as their Daddy.
Their grief at the loss of their Daddy supercedes all speculation. These kids lost their Dad and we should mourn with them for that.
If you have never stood at the graveside of a parent - perhaps you should not comment. It is one of the most heart-wrenching of all rites.
(building a head of steam, though I know you are joking) BUT LAMARCK WAS NOT RIGHT!!!
Sorry, but the the hypotheses of the late-18th/early-19th-century, proto-evolutionists, while tempting to the casual observer, are easily dismissed with a study of later evidence and thinking.
Well, Lamarck was right that insects are distinct from arachnids. But, no, I know Lamarck’s theory of adaptive evolution is outdated, so take deep breaths. 
I don’t see any resemblance to him at all, in any of the kids. They look so different from any member of the Jackson family. I’d be really surprised if they didn’t use sperm from a white guy.
A doctor, named Arnold KLEIN?
I guess Jackson’s lovely wife was getting Jewed and Kiked behind old Michael’s back.
How about that. His little Q-tip wasn’t enough for her…she needed some of that Kosher salami.
I can definitely detect Debbie Rowe in the older kids. There’s a hint of her stern jawline in them both.
The children see him as their Father. What do the genes matter?
These poor kids have lost their Daddy.
Why no compassion for them?
I have to agree. Who cares?
Michael was their daddy and that’s all that matters.
That little girl, Michaelina Junior just broke my heart at the memorial.
Who cares where the sperm came from. They need to be around their Aunts/Uncles and cousins. But away from Joe.
Um…really?
Well, it might make a difference in terms of inheritance. If they were not biologically related to him and he never adopted them, are they entitled to the estate?
I’ve seen pictures of the kids with lighter hair so it looks to me that at least Paris’s hair has been dyed. I see no visual family traits in these kids at all.