I have a beloved brother who’s a Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, MAGA hat guy. I can always refrain from talking politics. He can’t.
Unfortunately, the way I’ve taken to ending the conversation is by reminding him of one simple fact: I read and watch news from NO END of different sources, from all parts of the political spectrum. He doesn’t. So … as I occasionally remind him … I know everything that he knows, while he knows HALF of what I know.
[It’s far more true than it is condescending]
And everything that we’ve learned from the Dominion/Fox News lawsuit takes that to a dramatically worse level.
When I can get the conversation to come down to issues of fact, I always have the facts correct, and they always support my position. Most of the time, it’s a reflection of what his favored media outlets DIDN’T tell him (lies of omission).
So, I refrain from political discussions with my beloved brother.
But now I have a neighbor who is NOT MAGA but is very conservative (not really a RINO…), understands Trump’s innumerable personal failings, but liked … something about his policies. My neighbor is also in his 60’s and is classically socially conservative.
30 years ago, my lengthy talks with conservatives were stimulating and fun, because we read from the same hymnal but applied disparate values to the facts.
Since Fox (and other RW outlets – primarily Internet and cable TV), nearly every conversation that I have with a Trump supporter – definitely including my neighbor – leaves me horribly sympathetic to Joe Biden in the debate against Trump: if you could fact check him on the fly, that would be all you could do. You would never get a chance to describe your own agenda or share your vision for the country.
I’ve said it here before, but Brandolini’s Law and the Dunning-Kruger Effect accurately characterize the overwhelming majority of the MAGA movement.
The signs, clothing, swag, and sundry Trump/MAGA regalia? They simply remind me of an old meme:
Whenever you hear somebody start a sentence with ‘I seen,’ that sentence never ends with ‘the inside of a book.’