Fascinating thread.
Let me add some of my own thoughts, which will repeat of some of what we’ve already heard.
To understand the differences between Canada and the United States, you must first understand the similarities, and to understand that you have to examine the nations’ history and geography. The similarities between Canada and the USA can basicaly be summed up in three points:
- Both countries are former colonies of the British Empire.
- Both countries are immigrant-built New World nations.
- Both countries are really huge.
Points 1 and 2 sum up most of the common values shared by Canadians and Americans. There is a common value placed on the basic underpinnings of liberal democracy; freedom, capitalism, English common law, equality, and so on. There are differences here - Canadians widely accept government-run health care, many U.S. states have laws against homosexuality, the U.S. is economically freer, stuff like that, but the differences are not that great. Canada isn’t THAT socialist. If you ranked countries from 1 to 100 on Capitalism Index, the U.S. would be an 89, and Canada would be an 82.
As a result of the two countries sharing these values AND sharing much of a common history with Britain, there are many other incidental similarities. Culture is widely shared; Canadians watch Law and Order and Arnold Schwartzenegger movies, while Americans put up with Shania Twain for some reason. Most Americans and most Canadians share the same language. The U.S. and Canada have had many coincident historical events - they fought on the same side in a number of serious wars, gave women the vote around the same time, stuff like that. Both have mistreated North American aboriginal peoples, etc.
The other major similarity between them is size and the makeup of the population. Canada and the U.S. are BIG. Really, really big. Even U.S., with the world’s third-largest population and ten times the population of Canada, has far more empty space than populated space.
This means that Canada and the U.S. are, well, not European. The common idea of a nation-state sharing a common culture is a European idea, formed by the shift in Europe from feudalism to nationalism that started in earnest, I would think, with the Thirty Years’ War. European states had a vested interest in having homogenous populations; feudalism as a loosey-goosey system doesn’t require all your subjects have a common culture, but in a nation-state it’s awfully convenient if they do. Aside from holdovers like Austria-Hungary, there was an obvious and deliberate effort by most European nation-states to establish and even enforce a National Idenitity. Look at how many European nations actually banned the speaking of certain languages.
Canada and the U.S., other the other hand, are not European nations. There are, of course, elements of European-style nationalism, but I think it’s clear that both countries put far less emphasis on cultural homogenity (sp?) than their parent countries.
This, combined with the sheer SIZE of the countries, means that in any practical way it is impossible to compare the average Canadian to the average American, because there IS no consensus even on what a Canadian is or what an American is. Americans in Texas are very different from Minnesotans, who in turn are very different from the Miami Cuban community, who bear little resemblance to Hawaiians, who in turn are quite different from Nebraskans. We’re not talking about fringe minorities here; Americans who are very different from other Americans constitute ALL Americans. Same for Canadians; an Ontarian from Scarborough is very different from an Ontarian in the Ottawa Valley, who is very different from a Newfoundlander, who isn’t anything at all like someone from Calgary, and they’re all different from a Quebecer from Sherbrooke.
It’s impossible to say with any accuracy what the difference between Americans and Canadians is, because you’d first have to define which Americans and Canadians you’re talking about. Instead, you have to back off and speak in the broadest of generalities. There you will find the more general differences, and again I think this can be best summed up with a little history and geography. Basically, I would sum up the really important differences as such:
- The U.S. is warmer.
- Canada is bilingual.
- The U.S. was created by a revolution.
Rather obvious, but consider the consequences:
- American geography has resulted in the country growing much faster than Canada and consequently becoming a superpower, whereas Canada, while rich, isn’t as large or as significant a country. Canada’s smaller size also goes a long way towards explaining why it remained part of the British Empire until 1867, and remained tied to it until many decades later; it’s unlikely Canadians would have tolerated a lack of independence if the country had been substantially more populous and self-sufficient.
As a result of their relative sizes, Canada and the U.S. have two differences you notice on a day-to-day basis:
A) Canadians are far more aware of Americans than vice-versa, simply because America is so big and important. The U.S. exerts far more influence on Canada than vice-versa because it’s so much more populous. This really has little to do with anything besides sheer population; 280,000,000 people have more influence than 30,000,000. This has a sharp, very distinct effect on Canada’s self-image; Canadians are strongly, openly patriotic, and make a point to distinguish themselves from Americans, while at the same time having a bit of an inferiority complex towards them. An instructive point here is that the Canadians who are least rivalrous towards Americans are Quebecers - who, being so obviously a different nation, don’t share the same inferiority complex, because they don’t have to.
B) Canadians have a distinctly more internationalist outlook than Americans, primarily because Canada cannot wield much international influence on its own.
- Canada, of course, is a structurally bilingual country. It’s designed to be that way not out of the goodness of its heart, but because the country was originally FOUNDED as a compromise between Ontario and Quebec. As a result,
A) Canada’s bilingualism has been the absolute, no-questions-asked, #1 engine behind most of its history. The conscription crisis, regional arguments, Constitutional squabbles, oppression of minorities, separatist parties and separation referendums, the creation of at least one province (Manitoba), economic stratification, the rise and fall of Church power in Quebec, and on three occasions open civil war have all been the result of Canada’s bilingual nature. Not that bilingualism is BAD - it’s simply reality. Canada would not have survived had the two nations not formed one state, but the linguistic duality has defined the history of that state.
B) The country has become much more regionally fractured than the USA because of the fact that it was essentially created to suit the needs of Ontario and Quebec, with the other provinces added or created to suit central Canada’s needs - namely, the exploitation of natural resources and a bulwark against American expansionism. The various regional squabbles are too boring to get into, but believe me, if regional squabbles in the U.S. rated a 3 on the volume knob, Canada’s up around a 9.
Point 3, the U.S. having a revolution and Canada not, has obviously shaped both the history and governance of the two countries. Much of Canada was founded by refugees of the American Revolution - tens of thousands of people driven from their homes, their loved ones murdered and property stolen. They understandably took with them a bit of skepticism towards revolution. Canada’s political structure is, consequently, both more antiquated (an unelected Senate, the Queen as head of state) and more based on compromise and practical problem solving. The American system is idealistic, independent, and based on lofty principles. You could take the Constitution of the United States and slap in on pretty much any country; it’s a very basic governmental design. There are hardly any specific references to any part of the United States anywhere in the Constitution. You couldn’t do that with the Constitution Act of Canada, because it’s a very specifically written document with dozens of little exceptions and clauses that specifically deal with Canadians provinces and territories in different ways. American governance is based on principles; Canadian governance is based on practical concerns.
I hope this has been somewhat informative. Sorry for going on so long.