So when is Palin giving back all the clothes?

Can I use that for a song title tho?

I left my heart in Wasilla City?

Go right ahead.

I agree with you. If she keeps the clothes and doesn’t pay taxes on them, the fun would only increase. In any case, how can she be a legitimate Alaskan politician without breaking a few laws here and there?

‘Conscience’ or ‘Morals’ would scan better.

I’m going to say that the answer to the OP’s question is about two years.

All this makes me wonder. If Palin doesn’t return the clothes, and doesn’t report them on her income tax next April 15, would any US citizen be eligible to report her to the IRS and get the 10% reward? The IRS is still giving 10% to squealers, isn’t it?

All I know is that they don’t just shrug it off when you explain that something was “not filed timely due to administrative error.”

<aside> Fuck, I hate the recent mutation of “timely” into an adverb. </aside>

Perhaps she’s trying to get a law passed in Alaska setting out that you can’t strip a person of her clothing during winter.

Or perhaps she’s working with the NRA “I’ll give you my bra when you take it from my cold, dead hands!”

I think that’s Randy Scheunemann’s line.

With apologies to Matthew Prior, and his use of “timely” as an adverb from about three-hundred years ago:

Let prudence yet obstruct thy venturous way;
And take good heed, what voters will think and say;
That beauteous Palin vagrant courses took;
Her Alaskan house and civil life forsook;
That, full of youthful blood, and fond of McCa’n,
She from nor’ wood-land with an exile ran.
Reflect, that lessen’d fame is ne’er regain’d,
And virgin honor, once, is always stain’d;
Timely advis’d, the coming evil shun;
Better not do the deed, than weep it done.
No penance can absolve our guilty fame;
Nor tears, that wash out sin, can wash out shame.
Then fly the sad effects of desperate love,
And leave a banish’d McCa’n through lonely words to rove.

Huh, you all realise the solution is really really simple for this right?

At some point there will be a “public tender” sale at some point for “used campign disposables” or similiar. People will not be able to view the items. It will be posted in some backwords paper with a ciruclation of 15. Sarah will “win” the tender with a bid of a few thousands of dollars and the money donated to charity.

Everything squared away hunky dory a-okay you betcha its gonna be good.

Nah, she’ll just claim that they’re not really her clothes, she’s just storing them at her house for some friends. I mean, it worked for (former) Senator Stevens, right?

Wierd revisionism from the RNC:
Obama raised $104 million toward election’s close

There’s $120,000 that’s gone AWOL here, and what about that jacket Palin was wearing last week?

This treatment suggests that the $30,000 is in addition to the already reported $150,000. So it totals to $180,000, so far.

Fox news reports that other politicians have also spent campaign cash for sartorial purposes. Fox News does not specify the amounts involved.

Here’s the data from CREW:


     Rep. Andrews, $952.04

    Rep. Sanchez, $334.09

    Bill Dew, $1,089.16

    William Breazeale, $1,000

    Andrew MacPherson, Barr campaign staffer, $500.00 

According to CREW, these acquisitions violate campaign finance laws. I’ll note that William Breazeale’s use of $1000 of campaign money was three times worse than Sanchez’s $334 purchase. I am appalled by this misuse of funding by, “Reps. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) and Rob Andrews (D-NJ), Utah congressional candidate Bill Dew (R), North Carolina congressional candidate William Breazeale (R), and Andrew MacPherson, campaign staffer for Bob Barr‘s 2008 presidential campaign committee.” They should reimburse these funds to their campaign treasury, with interest.

Actually they said that, “each spent hundreds of dollars on clothing,” which is probably sufficient, though a reference to the $180,000 absorbed by the Palin family might have deserved a mention as well.

Don’t mind me, just feedin’ the wolves, don’chaknow.

From the NY Times:

I thought much of this had come out before, but perhaps it was just “rumor” that was defended against (i.e., this is just confirmation).

So the G.O.P. has the clothes. [partisan snark]I wonder which homophobic senator is wearing her underwear beneath is suit?[/snark]

I’m sure that was an accidental oversight, and not at all related to the fact that the other cases are two to three orders of magnitude smaller (comparable to the difference between stealing a ream of the office’s copier paper and stealing one of the office’s laptop computers). :rolleyes:

I thought that Palin was an accessory for McCain.

(with apologies to Andrew Lloyd Webber)

It won’t be easy, you’ll think it strange
When I try to explain what I think,
and I still need your love after all I’ve been sold

You won’t believe me
All you will see is a girl you don’t know
Although she’s dressed up to the nines
At sixes and sevens with you

I had to let it happen, I HAD to change
Couldn’t stay all my life in A-K
Looking out of the window (at Russia), staying out of the cold

So I chose the spotlight
Running around, buyin’ everything new
But I never impressed other than the base
I was never expected to do