Horse meat is not very common in Norway, except in so-called black sausage. If a grocery store has more than a handful of sandwich meats, it will have pre-sliced, vacuum packed black sausage.
Many girls (and boys, but they’re not affected as much) usually learn about the ingredients of black sausage in junior high. “Hey, do you know what you’re eating?”
Are you talking about horses being raised for their meat, or eating horses that had other occupations until they got lame and were deemed unworthy for that job?
I’m not sure about the first one, but I know many, if not most, of the horses in the US right now are not raised as food animals, they’re raised as pets/working horses (races). This means they get access to treatment and meds that are off-limits to other food animals.
While I wouldn’t mind eating a farm horse, or a horse that hasn’t received a lof of current equine meds, I would be wary of eating something that has been taking drugs whose bioavailability in the meat has not been studied, including drugs that are known to be toxic to humans.
It is news to me that the France is particularly associated with horsemanship. Lots of words came into English from French, I don’t think that proves anything. The word “horse” itself is Nordic/Germanic.
I have had horse meat on a couple of occasions and found it delicous. It is a very lean meat and is best when cooked rare. It is good for stews too. Horse meat from a race horse would be tough, raise a horse like a cow and it would be just as tender.
I’m sure it comes from the way that Americans tend to romanticize animals. Most Americans could never imagine eating dog, either.
People in other parts of the world see a big, muscular piece of livestock; we see the friendly, intelligent beast that carried Roy Rogers on his adventures and inspired My Friend Flicka.
Eh? The English never great horsemen? “Into the valley of death rode the 600” - Cardigan was plainly an idiot, but there was nothing wrong with their horsemanship. At least by the time when the “Sun never set on the British Empire” the British military put a great deal of emphasis on their cavalry regiments, and probably long before then.
And the aristocratic classes had horsemanship ingrained into their culture - fox hunts, steeplechases, etc. That latter point may be at the root of the English aversion to using the horse as a meat animal. Apart from the horse as a working animal, you had the privileged classes seeing horsey stuff as emblem of their status, and the evolution of the horse into a sort of pet.
When you consider the Plains Indians, remember that they didn’t have horses until the Spanish brought them over, which happened in 1540, but the various Plains tribes didn’t generally make use of them until the 17th and 18th centuries. Whether they also ate them or not, the place of the horse in their culture was not a long standing tradition - it was a revolution.
Great answer to this question in Frederick Simoons’s Eat Not This Flesh.
Summarizing: Ancient Indo-Europeans and most of their descendent cultures happily ate horseflesh, though they regarded horses very highly. Horse sacrifices were big-deal rituals. Oddly, Ancient Rome was something of an exception. Except for the October Equus race / sacrifice to Mars, they didn’t much eat horses. The early church in Rome, conveniently not in the habit of eating horses, found it both disgusting and pagan and tried to stamp out the practice. Some places (like Iceland) resisted. Some places more or less went along, and it became poor people’s food: if you had nothing else, you’d eat horse. That’s a powerful stigma.
It was only in the 19th century that the sale of horsemeat became legal in France (1866) and Germany. There was something of a marketing campaign that helped bring it about. There was a similar campaign in England but it was short-lived.
He says in the U.S. “horsemeat sold in the United States is subject to federal inspection; it is nutritious, low in fat, and reasonable in price; and some people do buy and consume it. One even reads of a horsemeat shop in Connecticut so successful that fifteen franchises were set up in New England and New York, with four to five thousand pounds of horsemeat in various forms being marketed on daily basis.” He then goes on about the prejudice against horsemeat in most of the U.S. and how our culture is exerting subtle pressure on others to avoid it.
ETA: If the Connecticut shop info. was correct, it seems to have been long out of business, and the sale of horseflesh looks like it’s illegal in that state.
AIUI, horses were seldom raised for food or leather* in the US. Those slaughtered were typically farm animals too old or injured to work.
*Horsehide used to be a much bigger volume commodity than horsemeat. When we farmed with horses, it was the utility leather for many goods: baseballs and gloves are best known, but it was also commonly used for apparel such as motorcycle and flight jackets. By the 1950s it was replaced in almost all applications by cowhide, which is almost as durable. Horse is now an expensive specialty leather.
The idea of eating horse meat is repulsive to me simply because horses are big, ugly, sinewy beasts. They look hard and athletic, and I imagine their meat to be chewy and not particularly pleasant. A bit like venison, from a similarly lean animal, which I have tried and really didn’t like. Give me soft, docile cows or pigs any time. They do absolutely no exercise at all, and as a result, their meat is tasty and tender.
If you could breed a type of layabout horse that did nothing much except eat a lot of hay, then yeah, I’d look into it.
British cavalry was very good at blowing its own horn, but it was largely acknowleged to be among the worse in Europe. From Harold’s huscarls to Henry’s V’s longbowmen to Wellington’s lobsterbacks, it was infantry that was always Britain’s strength, not cavalry.
Sorry, but no- English armies were never well known for their cavalry being a particularly large or effective part of their armies, at least in comparison to their contemporary peers (other European powers). Cultures with longstanding traditions of horsemanship in the lower classes like the Magyars, the Huns, and the Mongols are noted for their horsemanship in war, not cultures where only the nobility could ride. I’m with Alessan on this one.
And Cortez brought horses over to the mainland of the New World in 1519, I do believe, when he invaded Mexico. It’s possible that no horses escaped into the wild until 1540, but I doubt it took that long.
The first thing I thought of when I saw this thread was that episode. Only the bit I was trying to remember was when Archie just takes a bite of steak (Or is about to? Or maybe he and Michael are just debating?) and Michael whinnies.
I find it tasty, and would not mind having it more available.
It is because it isn’t a ‘traditional food animal’. Anything that isn’t traditional is immediately yucky and taboo.
You would not believe the thoughts expressed when I used to take in stewed heart for lunch … a few hispanics born out of the country were not bothered but everybody else was horrified. All it was was either pork or duck heart depending on what I managed to score in the grocery. When they brought in tripe, the anglos still had hissy fits at being subjected to organ meats…they would probably have shit bricks and bitched to HR if I had the temerity to bring in horse…
Not true, I could serve you part of the tenderloin of a horse and you would think it an amazing cut of beef if I used a sauce on it that masked the sweetness of the meat.
if you are going to eat horse make sure it is well cooked. Hundreds of people in france have caught trichinosis over the years through uncooked horse. However, in general horse is probably less disease ridden than most domesticated meat we eat.