Yep. He’s the gay temptation for the Married Man.
And this picture makes me think it’s not much of a stretch for him to “play” gay.
This is actually something I’ve been wondering. I have read some parts of the Bible, but since I am not Christian I don’t feel obligated to read it all. However, the parts I have read show that angels have no genitalia. How, then, is gender determined among angels? Gender typing, schemas, what? The placement of cheekbones? Whether or not they leave the royal throne’s seat up?
Honestly, I was never clear on that.
Well, the only way to tell is to mention Judy Garland.
They just rub each other funny–that’s how they get their jollies.
If there’s some hot lesbian love scenes (or what passes for them in a fundie movie) with Marnee McClellan, I’d have to watch at least those.
There’s actually surprisingly little Jesus, aka Son of God, in the Old Testament. Two angels enter Sodom, to see just how wicked it is, and while Lot tries to protect them, everyone else want to rape them. Genesis 19.
For the record, God’s decision to smoke Sodom had already been made before the incident with angels ever occurred. The men of Sodom wanting to “know” the angels (and it’s debatable whether that passage was meant to imply anything carnal) was not the reason Sodom was destroyed.
The expedition of the angels was a proximate cause.
What specific parts would those be? I’ve read the whole bible and, while I don’t have it memorized, I certainly don’t remember anything about angel dongs (or the lack thereof.) Are you sure you aren’t thinking of Kevin Smith’s Dogma?
There is in fact no mention at all of Jesus in the Old Testament.
Angels, then. Thanks.
No! Really? I can’t imagine why that would be! 
If he is a queermo, then why would he appear in a movie like this?
When I clicked on the OP’s link, I giggled at the word “Enter” and quickly realized I must have watched too much Beavis and Butthead.
Well, it is always said by fundamentalists that they have no genitalia. Doing some research, though, I have found my mistake: supposedly, they are spirits that, when they have to speak to humans, assume a male-body form. Otherwise, they are just spirits with no flesh or bones, generally being non-material beings. So to say that they are male angels is either redundant, missing the point, or wrong depending on the context.
This can be found, infered, or whatever in these passages: Luke 1:11, Matt 22:30, Col 1:16, 2 Kgs 6:15-17, etc.
But the question remains: if they assume a human, male body, do they also have a penis? I’m sure it would, but I also assume that, as seen in the Resurection, glow in the dark condoms would not be needed for angels.
If it is a parody, I appologize. Still, considering the amount of crazy fundy homophobes out there, I think it could go either way.
What really sucks is that most of the attractive crazy homophobe females I know WON’T go either way.
Wasn’t that the Hostess snack you used to see in commercials during Charlie Brown cartoons?
[George Carlin] Have you ever noticed that the women who are against lesbianism are ones you wouldn’t want to fuck anyway? [/GC]