But if every single man on earth has used this approach escalation every single time in order to get sex, how can you even distinguish it from sex itself? I mean, if every act of sex between a man and a woman has been this form of rape, what difference does it make what methods the man uses to obtain it (as in, how is roofie’ing a woman any worse than any other form of sex) ? Rape is rape, right?
Number of different sexual partners. High stratification refers to a phenomenon where 1 of 50 males receive, about 40 men out of every 1000, as can be observed in any school setting, where the sample is easier to make, receive about 80% of the actual variety of female sexual partners. This stratification (clustering discrepancies if you prefer) exists in all mammals at percentages around this area. The females, get 80% of their sexual variety from 2% of the male population; 1 out of 50 people doesn’t sound like much, but it offers vast experiences with different body types and personality types, relative to what most of the male population has to settle with; not much sexual variety.
Gender dimorphism forces a situation where men approaching women causes relative discomfort opposed to women approaching men; the majority sample forces as dynamic where men approaching women is always an act of aggression, even assuming that there may be some women who don’t show any signs of discomfort; these women as an exception, even if they hypothetically exist, do not suddenly make it ok for men to make initial approaches, men aren’t mind readers, so they have to act on the majority, to not elicit aggression in the vast instances where it will necessarily elicit discomfort relative to men.
Unless everyone is in heaven forever, there are winners and losers; and pleasure is derived from this. This is psychopathy. You are lying to me if you say that you play noncompetitive games, where you do not derive pleasure because someone failed. If you are truly interested in the winners, as you seek to profess, then you would want all players to be infinitely good at the game, the result being that the game is now impossible to play; at which point, having a psychopathic orientation to reality, you would cease to have fun, even though you’re no longer contradicting yourself. It is the self contradiction, which causes you joy. It follows from the premises and is necessarily true.
Exactly. What’s your point? It’s all different in kind, but it is all still a type of rape. Some might be easier on the woman than others… A guy doesn’t need to use any of this, and many men don’t; but if they don’t, they don’t get sex. That’s the price men pay for being good people. They’re not any less horny than the hypocrites, they’re just not hypocrites to get sex.
I’ve had a lot of luck baiting my penis and laying motionless on the sea floor. That’s not rape, is it?
So is there any way, in your opinion, to obtain sex without rape?
Do not accuse other posters of lying or imply that they are lying. This is strictly prohibited in the forum.
[ /Moderating ]
Your improper accusation of lying simply demonstrates either ignorance of a warped world view the ignores any fact that does not fit into your frame of reference. The are many non-competitive sports and an increasing number of non-competitive games (often used in team building programs or among children with anger issues). The notion that all games and sports are competitive is silly and not based on facts.
Oops… sorry, that’s a matter of intent. I meant to say that it’s a contradiction to play non-competitive games; as something without a winner or loser can’t even be defined as a game; that is a specific form of play, a scoreless activity that requires some element of skill.
It hasn’t been done yet. The best people can really do in this type of world system, is at least try to translate wealth to the best of their ability - at least it’s moving consciousness in that direction; the current situation is absurd, compared to actually trying.
What the heck is a ruhfee?
Golf can be played solo with the only intent to beat one’s own handicap.
Rock climbing and mountain climbing do not need to be competitive.
You are creating a definition of a word for your own purpose while ignoring reality.
So speaking ideally, in your opinion, should every single hetero male in the world be in prison?
Alternative, nonstandard, spelling for roofie. Rohypnol
Where did you get these figures from? And why are they significant to the concept of heterosexual interactions being inherently akin to rape? Why do you think this dynamic is significantly different for gay people?
How does gender dipmorphism cause that discomfort? Why does dimorphism make any heterosexual interaction inherently aggressive? My last boyfriend was a short, skinny dude. The woman I dated before him had two inches and a good fifty pounds on me. Why were my interactions with a much smaller, frailer man not inherently aggressive, while my interactions with a woman who was larger than me were? How does the fact that both relationships were initiated by the other person factor into your analysis?
It is interesting that your response to data that doesn’t fit your thesis is to immediately accuse the person providing that data of lying. It makes me question how much other data you’ve rejected because it doesn’t fit your preconceptions.
Huh. I used his spelling, and didn’t get a single hit on Google.
They need to take responsibility; stop using euphoric recall for ill gotten gains; that’s a very harsh punishment! I had to go through it myself; it’s brutal. It’s like being punished by the whole world at once if you do it right. Stop acting out as well.
I don’t think that words mean what the OP thinks they mean.
Miller, I was projecting myself onto you. I would have been lying to call something a non-competitive game, because anything without a winner or loser cannot be defined as a game; it would be scoreless play. It was so obvious to me, that I projected that if I was you, I’d have been lying. It was my mistake to project your intent like that. Tomanddeb were correct.
Forest Green, have I got a site for you. You will certainly find that cubic thinking will extend your theories. There’s a lot of similarities. Let me know what you think.
Here’s another one you might be able to solve ethics at.