Something for Conservatives

Thank you for proving my point, once again.

And thanks to you as well for proving my point.

Shut up. You’re contributing to global warming.

No, I’m laughing at you and the others because of the retarded posts you people keep putting up, while smugly thinking that you are so superior to me.

You find that hard to believe? Go back to my original post in this thread. Read all the posts directed to me from that point onward. Only one post in that entire batch showed any intelligence whatsoever. The rest look like a compilation of mouth-drooling scribbles made by people with less than a room temperature IQ.

You may now return to your regularly scheduled childish behavior…

Childish? This from the one who, when at a loss for words, responds with “Fuck off.”

So, I wonder… is Clothy and SamuelA related? Brothers of a dumber mother, perhaps?

Maybe it’s his kid. Same kicked-in-the-head thought processes.

I also want to point out that there actually are only 100ish billion galaxies in the universe now.

The reason that there are a couple trillion in the observable universe, is because the observable universe is the past. When we look billions of lightyears away, we are looking billions of years ago.

Galaxies merge and combine, so, when we look out to the distant past, shortly after galaxies first started forming, there were more of them, and they were smaller.

So, when we pulled out bigger and more powerful telescopes, and looked even further back into the past than we ever had before, we saw that there were more galaxies in the past than there are now. We did learn something about galaxies merging and how quickly that occurs and some other fun astronomy facts, but it did not invalidate the observation that there are 100ish billion galaxies in the observable universe now.

I think in Rowe’s story at the bar, where the one guy frowned at his beer, he was trying to figure out how to explain that in a way that an actor and narrator would understand.

In fact, nearly any time you manage to fluster a scientist, it is not because you have managed to upend scientific thinking, it is because they are trying to figure out how to explain all the things that you need to know in order to know how wrong you are.

:smiley:

color added.

There’s really no doubt about it clothy. You’re just a dumbshit in the wrong world. It’s not your fault, God fucked up.

God is a 10 year old black belt.

Right, everyone was just waiting for your go-ahead.

To who?

“Sir, I think you just pissed on your own shoes?”
“Thank you for proving my point!”

Actually, a 12 year old boy with Asperger’s.

All due respect, but part of the problem (as I see it) is that you also smugly think that you’re so superior to everyone else here, and generally aren’t willing to accept that you may be either misunderstanding something that someone says, or willfully ignoring it.

It puts people in an antagonistic mode. They know that you automatically discount their viewpoint, so why should they make an attempt to engage you civilly?

Yes, childish. Incredibly so.

And it certainly wasn’t a loss for words. When I tell someone to fuck off, they have gotten to the point where a tree stump can carry on a more intelligent conversation than they can.

Thank you for proving my point yet again.

Give up, Morgenstern. You are clueless and doomed to remain so.

Oh, you certainly didn’t need my permission. You’ll continue to act childish anyway.

Clothahump can’t be that stupid- just look at all the dozens of ways he’s come up with to say “no u”.

Plus he’s doing a great job of making Mike Rowe look like a genius of science, logic and rhetoric, if only by comparison.