[QUOTE=Jophiel] Shrug, he was told he was “over reacting”.
As long as one’s sole response is an internet message board post, I don’t think it can ever be considered “over reacting”. Besing peeved and making a post about something seems like a perfectly acceptable response to me. I guess you’re saying people just wanted to crap on his thread because they wouldn’t have ever cared if that happened so how dare someone make a thread about it.
Which sure seems like “over reacting” to me
[/QUOTE]
I don’t see how disagreeing with someone is “crapping on their thread”. I agree with you - whoever said “how dare you make a thread about it” was wrong. Who was it who said that?
I mean, this is getting silly. Since when are we not allowed to disagree with someone else’s viewpoint?
[QUOTE=DSeid]
Y’know Kid, when I saw your name as the last post I had half expected you to be taking umbrage at the op insulting her being a size 2!
[/QUOTE]
That was an insult? :eek:
Now if he’d said, “I’m outraged because the model was a size 2, how can I explain to my son that real women have curves?”, why there’d be a nasty and poorly written reply or two, I’ll tell you!
Naked women != porn unless you’re amazingly uptight. Given the setting – a waterfall – my first impression would be that the photographer was aiming for, if not art, certainly not sleaze.
[/QUOTE]
Well, yeah, I don’t see it as necessarily going for porno either.
But… doesn’t it all depend on what use the waterfall - perhaps a small splash-off, actually - was going to be used for?
