I watched the landing of the Discovery today and have a few questions. First, the shuttle landed and there was no movement from within, nor did anyone go out to greet it. If I spent twelve days in space I would want to get out and touch ground again, but the broadcast just cut away and started doing replays of the landing. So how long do the astronauts stay on board after landing and what are they doing? Post flight checks?
Second, the * Discovery *landed in California. How does it get back to Florida?
There are several reasons that there is no immediate burst of activitiy when it hits the ground…
I imagine it’s still pretty warm, having punched through the atmosphere just a short time before. Although I do remember seeing someone pick up a piece of heating tile ceramic while it was still glowing hot, so I could be wrong.
After the stress involved in landing, I imagine the pilot just wants to breath for a few. The shuttle handles like a brick with wings, and there is no second chance… if it bungles it’s approach, it crashes, end of movie!
You have to make sure the crew hasn’t been taken over by aliens.
The shuttle is loaded onto the back of a modified 747 and flown back to Florida. This costs us $750,000 to do, according to CCN online.
Now see, when I have my private industry launch complex, we’ll just load it up and send it back up for a flight, and then it could land back in Florida. of course, if I were in charge, I would have used rockets from the beginning…
I think that the main reason NASA lets the shuttle sit for a few minutes after landing is to give any leaked propelant from the small rocket engines (R.C.S.) that are used to stear the shuttle a chance to disapate.
From what I hear its pretty toxic stuff.
Peace
LIONsob
When I worked at Edwards AFB on the Shuttle Support Team (I sent rawinsonde data to Houston), I was told that the crew remained in the shuttle so the toxic fumes could be cleared as LIONsub said. I think they remove any residual fuel from the tanks.
NASA-Dryden has weekday tours and you might see the 747 there. It’s a short tour, and aside from the static displays what you see depends on what’s on the ramp; but it’s cool to be there. Plus they have a nice little gift shop.
Then why don’t they land it in Florida and save us a few bucks? If they have the facilities at Kennedy Space Center to land a 747 with a shuttle attached, can’t the shuttle alone land there too?
AWB, the weather in Florida has been unsuitable for several days (high winds). The crew waited for a couple of days to see if there was any improvement, but there was no change, so they requested the change in landing site.
To clarify a bit what malden said, they do land in Florida. Every flight since 1996, in fact. This time the weather sucked in FL, so they landed in CA. It’s worth the million bucks to not kill another crew of astronauts and lose an N billion dollar orbiter.
The crew does have to wait before they pop the hatch. IIRC they also bring up a cryogenic tank truck and pump LN2 through the hull so as to avoid the thermal pulse from re-entry soaking down into the airframe and doing a lot of damage.
There is a famous picture of a ceramic tile fresh from the furnace being held by its corners barehanded while the center of it still glows red hot.
All in all, the shuttle is a marvel of engineering and a well deserved source of national pride.
NASA had a better description than that of what exactly goes on during this process, with pictures and other goodies, but exhaustive use of their search engine didn’t turn up what I was looking for.
> If they have the facilities at Kennedy Space Center to land a 747 with a shuttle attached, can’t the shuttle alone land there too?
The 747 can land on a shorter runway than the shuttle. The 747 also has engines, so it can abort a landing & go somewhere else if necessary. The shuttle cannot- it is essentially a heavy glider when it lands, no second chances.