Just as they reshot those scenes of the spaceship for Rocketship X-M, and the way Lucas retooled scenes from his original Star Wars trilogy, I’ve often thought that they should use CGI technology to improve some older films:
The Ten Commandments 91956 version). I have to agree with the commentator on the 1923 version DVD – the animated flames that form “the finger of god” and also the “Pillar of Fire” , both done as cartoon animation, look really hokey, and did even when the film was new. If they used CGI to replace those obviously cartoon elements, it’d look a helluva lot better.
I wouldn’t touch the Angel of Death effects, or the Rain of Hail, and especially not the Parting of the Red Sea. For all their now-apparent flaws, they still work.
But I would fix up the ragged-edge bluescreen/greenscreen.ChromaKey-like effects that you see when something is rapidly moved in front of such a background, as when the colored flags are waved during the “obelisk” scene.
The Hunt for Red October – good Cold War action film, based on Tom Clancy’s first bestseller, suffers from extremely cartoony effects work. It’d be 1,000 percent better if those shots of torpedos and depth charges were redone in modern, realistic-looking CGI. They can also clean up that scene at the end when they’re sailing the sub into the river in New England, and the background is “bleeding” through Sean Connery’s head.
The Last Starfighter – I’m a little torn about this one, because the crudeness of the early CGI is part of the film’s charm. On the other hand, it’s obviously not really what they were hoping for. I’ve seen some of the renders they did of the Gunstars for still images, and they looked gorgeous – only they didn’t look like that in the finished film. I can only conclude that they had to cut corners and use less rendering time for the bulk of the film, with the results that Centauri’s Space Car, the Gun Stars, the Headquarters, the asteroid, and all the alien ships look more like cartoons than real things. If it were reone in modern CGI it’s be much closer to what they really wanted.
The Incredible Shrinking Man – another 1950s flick, this one was one of the best of the “B” movies. That classification indicates the sort of budget they wer given, not the quality of the film. They did a good job in most of the scenes, but in others the small budget shows – as when a midget-sized hero crosses a street, and the crude halo around his image broadcasts that this is an effect gone bad. I’d clean up the scenes like this where they fell short of their ideal, and leave the others alone.