Then how on earth did you miss “too”?
Its funny the reaction you get from supposed open minded individuals, I did not post these allegations, I found them out on the web, you are free to make up your own mind, I feel bad for the mother of the slain choir leader, she is the one making the accusations.
I did a little search on Donald Young and it seems like its a dead end investigation, no leads only accusations of a cover up.
Who would have thought Jerry Sandusky was a closet homosexual.
Aaaaaaand we have.
I can find the Time Cube guy on the internet. Does not mean that he’s correct.
There is a lot of crazy stuff out there. It would behoove you to not just suck it up and then spew it out in an uncritical manner.
Jerry Sandusky wasn’t a closet homosexual, he was a pedophile.
A stunning analogy. Now all you have to do is produce multiple victims willing to testify in court and eyewitness testimony of Obama in the act, and it will certainly apply to the allegations you’ve brought to the thread.
Also, what miss elizabeth said. Sandusky’s a pedophile, not a homosexual.
I’m genuinely surprised someone as open-minded and intellectually curious as yourself would make such glaring errors.
Obama was not raised as a Muslim and he didn’t attend any “Muslim school”.
He attended a public school and later he attended a Catholic school.
In short, you’d have at least as much evidence that he’s a secret Catholic.
Anyway I recommend avoiding putting forth arguments associated with ignorant trolls.
Since this is a hockey thread, shouldn’t we be debating whether Gary Bettman’s a secret Muslim?
Since this is a hockey thread, shouldn’t we be debating whether Gary Bettman’s a secret [del]Muslim[/del]Martian?
FTFY
No need to look any further than the join date of the problem poster.
uh what? That was in response to the idea that Obama would want to debate Thomas. This was just another baby-kissing photo op for a politician. Why would he want Thomas the plumber mucking up a perfectly good photo with a sound bite?
Hey, you were the one claiming it was a political event, not us! THOMAS was the one trying to make it political.
Apparently, you can’t have it both ways, can you? (And no, for him to do so would have been entirely out of line)
He was speaking in code! In code! :eek::rolleyes:
Are you dreaming? These events aren’t a tete a tete for political input.
The man had a conscience, and you’re trying to treat him like he was one of the Dixie Chicks!
The Dixie Chicks did nothing wrong either. In fact, they did far less than this. They merely expressed their opinion about the president on their own time.
From Shodan’s link:
“I heard you donated to the Conservatives. We’re Librul 'round here. You donate to our candidates, and be seen with who we say. You’re fired.” (or vise versa)
You can’t possibly say your employer can dictate to you any type of political activity.
[QUOTE=Guinastasia]
They wouldn’t be firing for his political views, but for his refusal to participate in promotional events. Which is what this is considered, no matter what people say. (How many times do athletes have to meet with the mayor, or the governor? It’s all about public relations.)
[/QUOTE]
“We think it would be good for public relations if you were seen shaking the hand of Satan. you don’t have to agree with him, you just have to **shut your mouth **and pretend you do. conscience assuaged.;)”
A. So, what? Obama = Satan?
- Produce a Satan for someone to shake hands with, and you might approach a point.
It’s all a matter of opinion, isn’t it?
It’s true, in the United States, a private employer can fire you for political reasons, but I don’t see that as a good thing.