I just saw The Next Generation on Sky the other day for the first time in years.I was shocked cos It looks terrible. The sets look too beige, the acting is dodgy and the storylines seem so much worse than they did when i first watched it. It seems to have dated far worse than the original Star Trek. Ugh I must be getting old.
I think it has aged poorly as well though it still beats Voyager. I’d put the best TOS episodes against the best TNG episodes any day. TNG was a bit to self-rightous at times for my taste.
Amen on the over use of biege, I saw some episodes again after my pal got season 1 and 2 on dvd and almost every set looked like my doctor’s waiting room. bleh.
I’ve seen every episode of TOS and TNG but I don’t know the names of most of the episodes. I know more of the TOS epsidoes simply because I’ve been watching them since I was 5 or 6. One thing I’ve noticed is that the episodes that were good 30 years ago are still good and those that were bad are still bad.
I really hated Roddenberry’s heavy handed new age philosophy presented in TNG. “Starfleet is not a military organization” my ass! (Though again Voyager was a lot worse in the new age touchy feely department.) I always found it odd that the most alien creatures on TNG were the humans.
Well i didn’t watch every episode of TNG but the Moriarty Holodeck one was on and several others that I had seen and enjoyed before but now they look so terrible. As someone else mentioned the New-ageyness of the dialogue is terrible. Also the educating Data motif seems really, really corny now. I’m sure if I saw some of the episodes that people have been citing as the best again I’d probably have a slightly different opinion but in general it seems much inferior to when i watched it years ago.
I think teh first couple seasons REALLY didn’t age well–but the later ones (after Riker grew his beard, as a general benchmark) hold up just fine.
But still, one quick glance at the movie “Generations” reminds you how amazing it all can look if you spend the time/money on the proper lighting. (I could watch that damn scene in his ready room, when the star goes nova, about a million times…)
I didn’t mean to sidetrack this into a discussion of good/bad episodes. To reply to the OPs contention that TNG has not aged well:
I’m not sure what “the acting is dodgy” really means. Patrick Stewart, Bret Spiner (how do you pronounce Spiner, anyway?) and Michael Dorn are top-notch actors. The rest: not as good.
Beige? You’re complaining about the color of the sets/lighting? Sheesh, talk about nit-picking!
Story lines are uneven, to say the least. Some were quite good, IMHO of course, and many sucked. There’s only so much you can do when you have to have a new script every darn week. As I said before, I think that TNG had more good scripts than TOS.
How a show looks is such a flavour-of-the-moment sort of thing that sometimes it goes out of style and comes back in. Whatever you nominate as the best looking show right now, I guarantee that it will look dorky in 15 or 20 years. Then it might be cool again in another 15 or 20.
I wasn’t aware that movie even had lighting. The Enterprise was so conspicuously dark in Generations, it was genuinely annoying. I couldn’t see a damn thing!