SA I wasn’t addressing you in that post. I was addressing Heff. We’d been having a conversation. There’s no need to come back a rebut anything. Really.
Hentor Query. “Cosby-esque” = Jackpot?
Answer = yes. We have a new “rape scale”. ::shudder:: “Cosby-esque”, first-time offender, repeat-offender. Although where does rape by a “Cosby-esque” offender go? 'Cause that’s definitely a repeater right there.
Social Promotion “versus” Rape
Being illiterate is not worse than being raped. It’s just not.
5 seconds on the Google will let you find myriad links on the difficulty rape survivors have in dating, marriage, and careers. Slightly longer (thank you search function) will find you many threads here on the Dope from survivors and their partners exploring those same issues. If you are sincerely interested, I will help you find some of these.
Illiterate people can become educated. They can date. They can marry. They can procreate with or without marriage. They may or may not be ashamed. You assume a lot about their condition.
Finally, on civil rights.
Read Post #105. Hentor already pulled a bunch of your previous posts on this topic. Yes, you did say we should have done it more slowly. Literally, that word. No one misinterpreted you.
IMHO, not close. Jackpot = guffawing uncontrollably, tears streaming down face. YMMV.
Oh, he has no problem denying anything even with the evidence in his face (see, e.g., the golden rule thing in this thread or the winning of the Paterno thread). Evidence won’t shake his delusions. BTW, I didn’t find the original instance, nor did I come close to citing all examples of his expressing that particular idiocy.
Hentor, unless you can show that Starving Artist posted what you claimed despite his assertion that he didn’t, your argument doesn’t have any validity.
It could have been that the status of African-Americans could have risen at the same rate or faster under a different policy. If it could have, your claims of immorality disappear. One of the reasons I am unwilling to debate the underlying issue is because I’m beginning to realize that you’re distorting what was posted. The other reason is that I don’t have the background in the subject matter since the argument came from another thread.
This is something he does constantly. Lies and distortions are all he has so that’s what he goes with.
A couple other examples are when he’s claimed in the past that I said black people got the bends from giving them their rights too soon, and he continues to try to inject pedophilic salaciousness into my challenge of a bet as to whether a group of kids would agree with the claim that a hug in the shower was every bit as bad as anal rape…but really just about anything he posts in rebuttal to a post he doesn’t like is going to contain dishonest bullshit. Cites are definitely in order in discussing any claims he’s made about what someone he disagrees with has said.
Oh, it comes as no surprise to me that on a board composed to a significant degree of rabid liberals that strong criticism of liberalism would be met with opposition. It’s just too bad that the opposition has to contain so much dishonesty.
On the other hand, maybe it’s not so bad. You know what I say when people have to lie about or distort what I’ve said in order to rebut my remarks…it means I’m WINNING!!
“Lies and distortions” are all you’ve got, SA, when it comes to your apologia for men showering with boys. Here’s a post from another thread wherein you spell out your insane world view: (sorry everybody, it’s long but illustrative)
To which I felt compelled to reply as below. My opinion of SA has not changed for the better over the intervening time.
So you decided to post comments I made fairly early on in the thread before it became clear what Sandusky had been doing and in response to having been asked what besides rape it could possibly have been, and it is this you choose to use in your attempt to defend accusations that you’re distorting what I’ve said?
Yes, I said a lot of things in the earlier stages of that thread that I wouldn’t have said later on as more information became available.
You know it and I know it. You’re simply hoping that by taking things out of context and playing to a sympathetic audience you’ll get some sort of Brownie points. But you’re a dishonest piece of shit too, and posting misleading comments that I eventually came to change my mind on amounts once again to lies and distortion…and in my humble opinion, more – WINNING!!
That’s actually post #206 out of 249 in its particular thread. If the only way you can defend yourself is to post misleading claims about CannyDan’s citations, that must mean you’re…LOSING!!
Jesus fucking Roosevelt Christ, I might see your point if this thread weren’t scattered with my posts rebuking, disagreeing, or ridiculing the most idiotic of his beliefs. Neither have I said a word about how others are behaving. It’s clear he gives just as much as he gets, I’m hardly broken up over this pitting, in fact I was one of the first posters in to say I fucking endorse it, because I’ve been slogging through all his bullshit in the Six Threads of Rape Week over the past several weeks of rape. The idea that I’ve issued some kind of sweeping defense of his views or his behavior is a gross mischaracterization, which people might fucking realize if they’d been in on the rapey fun from the beginning. That my outrage doesn’t rise to the level mandated by the Teeming Millions is tempered by the fact that he’s been competing lately with fucktards like crucible and kstarnes.
Fuck ‘‘white knight,’’ it’s a bullshit phrase people use to discredit someone they don’t agree with. I give two fucks about what people on other message boards think.
It should probably be rated R given all the anal rape, and tubes, and old old men with their things in the tube and . . . uh, I don’t even want to think about it any more. You guys can go without me, I’ll just make some popcorn at home and watch Netflix.
