Colander, I’m with VT on this one.
You’re an awesome poster so please run now.
Otherwise he ends up driving you insane and then eats your brains …
He should only be observed in the wild from a safe distance and never, ever, interacted with.
Yes, a lot of people find it very disturbing when someone requests that they actually back up their conclusions with evidence, examples, etc.
No, more like this.
Ohhhh, I was supporting a claim, though.
Oh I see now. Yes, if I’d asked for a picture so I could better understand what “driftwood” means, that would have been helpful.
Thank you again for your concern.
Like stuffing your pie hole with doughnuts isn’t really conducive to losing weight?
Why would you put doughnuts in your pie hole? That’s where the pie goes!
Where should I put my pizza?
Pizza pie. Pie hole.
Sure they are! Its only calories in/ calories out, remember? If i only eat a thousand calories per day, and i want all of them to be honeywheat donuts, theres no reason I wouldn’t lose weight.
Stoid, one thing I would appreciate if you clarified. I know you don’t view all calories as created equal. Do you believe that if a person has a basal metabolic rate of, say 2000 calories, and they are consuming 2200 calories a day, it’s possible for that person to lose weight, depending on the type of calories they are consuming? Or is it that you accept the calories in < calories out theory, but just feel that carbs make it more likely you will consume more?
If you maintained that diet, you would obviously lose weight, pretty quickly. Of course, you (or I, this isn’t personal) wouldn’t maintain it.
Well, BMR is the starting point, right? So if they are running marathons then they will lose weight. 
And yes, carbs drive appetite.
But to answer what I know you are really getting at, as best I’m able, consider the people who effortlessly maintain a stable weight without ever thinking about what they are eating. They can “go crazy” during the whole holiday season, regularly eating much higher calorie totals than they usually do, still never thinking about it. If they gain anything, it’s very little, and then very quickly after they go back to whatever is regular eating for them, they return to their stable weight.
There’s one or both of two things going on: their body is dumping or burning the excess calories, and/or their appetites are adjusting naturally to keep consumption in the range necessary to maintain a stable weight.
But very few people in America, specifically, ever have a chance to develop such a naturally healthy, efficient internal weight regulation system because of so many outside forces that disrupt it, very possibly starting as early as the womb, when Mom’s fucked up eating habits may be affecting baby. The disruption is nutritional, cultural, emotional… All by itself, eating so much pure, distilled sugar is deadly for the system.
And that’s my best answer.
Too true. Honeywheat fatigue actually sets in pretty fast.
For what it may be worth, I think that there are two issues here which can be conceptually separated: First, the effect that eating a donut has on your fat metabolism. Second, the effect it has on your brain and appetite system.
As far as the first goes, calories in/calories out is a pretty good model and indeed if somebody was locked in a room and given 1000 calories a day worth of donuts, he would lose weight.
The second issue is the more interesting one. I think most people have observed that eating junk food like donuts gives you the urge to eat more and more.
Second issue is directly related to the first. Your fat metabolism affects your brain and appetite. They are intimately connected and cannot be separated. So yes, eating the donuts or bread or potatoes or sugar drives you to eat more…because of your fat metabolism.
You two should meet for dinner and discuss this face to face.
They wouldn’t be able to agree on a restaurant.
Well I thought it was classier than, “get a room”.