Considering how much camera surveillance Britain has, it’s hard to imagine they don’t have a couple on Stonehenge. It’s not like the place is the worlds largest ball of rubber bands or some other trivial site.
What they got was a little piece of stone, it’s not part of Stonehenge any more and it will look just like any other pick of rock. Do they think it’s magic or something? A sort of holy relic?
The (urm) essense? of Stonehenge is that it’s an arrangement of bloody great rocks thousands of years’ old you don’t get any of that from a little chip of stone.
Of course, Stonehenge is a bit of a con anyway, cos most of the rocks have just been plunked down where the 19th-century “restorers” thought they ought to go, having fallen over and been generally kicked around over the years.
And for some reason it’s obligatory for all American tourists who visit it to say “Gee, it’s so small.”
Just restoring a longstanding tradition. My Stonehenge guide book (purchased at the official Stonehenge gift shop) mentions that in the old days you could go into town and rent a hammer and chisel for precisely that purpose.
I might have said “Gee, it’s so small,” but I’m not sure.
I did get a really beautiful photo of it in the crisp cold January air. I keep it in my office.
I didn’t – it was big enough for me.
I visited before they isolated the thing, so I could go up and touch the stones. My comment was that I wasn’t terribly impressed by the so-called dagger images on the rocks.
“You’ve got to have faith!” replied a guard, when I mentioned this.
What the heck – it’s bigger and more impressibve than America’s Stonehenge