Stop the presses. Amazon reviewer misses point.

I know, I know.

I’m looking to continue updating my music collection to CD, and I was browsing Amazon for The Complete Robert Johnson. I know it’s fantastic stuff. I’ve had it on tape since it was originally reissued. I just wanted it on CD.

I made the severe mistake of browsing the reviews. Most of them were positive, or at least understanding (“Songwriting was great, guitar was amazing. Recording quality is dated, etc.”) Then I happened upon this one from Blues Lover in Detroit:

My jaw just dropped.

Sorry, had to share. Somebody less humor-impaired than me: is this a joke review? The stuff about Zeppelin makes it sound jokey, but then the other remarks make it seem serious. I’m confused.

Cue the Doper waiting in the wings just ready to agree wholeheartedly with Blues Lover.

As someone who’s read quite a few Amazon reviews in his life, I can tell one thing:

That’s not out of the ordinary. A sizeable amount of the reviews on Amazon are of a similar “quality”.

He knows Led Zeppelin has a good guitarist because he saw him play guitar! Silly me, I’d been trying to determine guitarist quality by listening to people play!

No no. You misread that. See, Led Zeppelin is a good guitar player.

You’re missing half the humor here. :slight_smile:

He is right, Led. Zep is way better … just kidding.

I have to admit, it took me a while to get into Robert Johnson. I love the blues, but the roots blues is tough to listen too sometime.

Now that I have gotten older I really enjoy the “musical stylings” of Robert Johnson.

Sometimes they’re jokes, but some people are completely clueless.

Like for the movie “The Unforgiven” (directed by John Huston, starring Burt Lancaster and Audrey Hepburn). The main premise of this film (not really a spoiler, but don’t read if you don’t want to know anything) is that Hepburn is an adopted sister. ADOPTED. So why is it so horrible for her “brother” (Lancaster) to be in love with her, and her to be in love with him?

But according to one reviewer, this was EWWWW gross, because brother and sister are in love with each other.

And then there was this murder mystery with Tommy Lee Jones, where one of the reviewers complained that “we never learned who murdered the guy or why.” You stupid moron, if you were awake you’d have KNOWN who did it. It wasn’t a big secret! smack! Pay attention!

Oh, and my favorite! A movie with a big “twist” mystery ending (I usually guess these things but I NEVER guessed this one) had it spoiled, with no warning, by one of the clueless reviewers. This person just blurted out who dunnit and why. How did this get past Amazon.com? I even went so far to write to Amazon, point to the review in question and tell them that they really needed to edit it, but last I checked, nothing had been done.

And then in the music area, the thing that pisses me off, as a big film music buff, is when people automatically assume that a soundtrack CD is going to have all the pop songs from the movie. No. They. Don’t. HAVE. To. NO.

A lot of these movies have film score composers (people like Jerry Goldsmith, James Horner, John Debney) who write very lovely film scores, and sometimes the CD features this instrumental music instead of the pop compilation music. Or sometimes it’ll have a pop song or two, but the majority will be the orchestral score.

This is one of the reasons why Amazon lists all tracks on most of these CDs and in many cases, offers RealAudio snippets of several pieces, so you cn hear what’s on the CD. So, to complain that you bought this CD and it didn’t have xxx pop song (when the information on Amazon’s page specifically doesn’t list that song) is assinine. To them slam the beautiful orchestral music of Goldsmith, Debney or Horner, not because their music is bad, but because it “doesn’t have a beat” or “is boring” is equally assinine. Don’t buy a film score CD if what you want is a compilation of pop songs. Don’t rate this fine CD with a low score just because you were too stupid or inattentive to actually know what you were buying. What a bunch of morons!

It’s a troll.

My God. I was actually giving this guy too much credit. I am agog.

Viz. -> :eek:

I thought Zeppelin was way better than Led.

I think you were whooshed. I mean, who the hell really thinks that Led Zeppelin is a guy?

He is a guy. Pink Floyd is his wife.

Pink Floyd is a dog silly! He’s Seamus’ brother.

I would tend to agree that this guy is probably a troll. But if you’re familiar with One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, this review will have you rolling on the floor with laughter as it’s impossible to conceive of a more clueless review from a sincere individual. Anytime a review begins with “OK, I’m going to expose a harsh reality that seems to be going unspoken up until now” you know you’re in for a treat.

1SDR, don’t call her a dog, she’s just Mizunderstood!

Wonder what he’d have to say about John Lee Hooker.

Wow, that’s so ignorant it’s scary. If I had to guess, I’d say that “Blues Lover” is about 14 years old and has never heard any real blues music.

However, I love his “fast=good” evaluation of “Led Zeppelin’s” guitar playing skills. Why get anal about sloppy, shitty sounding guitar work? Woohoo, it’s fast!

Yeah, but can Led Zepplin play the flute like Jethro Tull? Mr. Tull is the best flute player in Rock and Roll, baby. Jethro Tull is great because he plays really fast. Not like those lame slow flute players.

Well, if it’s any comfort to you, Robert Johnson has my Ringnecked Parrot’s stamp of approval. He attempts to sing along to my Robert Johnson CD while holding his wings open, stretching his left foot, and shrinking his eye pupils. That is a Ringneck’s way of saying it’s a 5 star record.

If he doesn’t like music he ignores it. He ignores Led Zeppelin.

Is he Graf Zeppelin’s brother?

I think it’s disgraceful, the way he glorifies prostitution.