Straight Dope Bourbon Society

Bumping this once again because of Old Weller Antique. I recently bought some as well, based on recomendations from this thread. I have to agree that for the money it’s quite good. I’ve definitely spent more money on lesser bourbons. But it was missing something. I’m not quite sure what…maybe just one unique flavor to grab me and hold my interest.

I suppose I’m expecting too much from a $17 bourbon. It shouldn’t be expected to taste like a single barrel bourbon when it’s not. By way of comparison though, at just $2 or $3 more, I think Wild Turkey 101 is a better buy.

I’m glad this thread was bumped, as I meant to do so but forgot. I had the opportunity last night to drink about a quarter bottle of Woodford Reserve. I was impressed–that’s a nice whiskey. I may have to pick up a bottle for myself.

ultrafilter I too enjoyed Woodford Reserve the one time I had it.

Ass For A Hat how odd that you compared Old Weller to Wild Turkey 101 as that was the bottle I got to sip on after I had the Old Weller. While I was drinking it I was thinking to myself I don’t know why I paid more for this when I enjoyed the Old Weller more. Of course this could be due to the fact that WT101 was my everyday drink for quite some time and OW provided something new for me to enjoy. Only one way to tell for sure, and that’s to resume the testings once more!

I’m also glad this thread got bumped, hopefully we can keep it up for a bit.

Interesting. Now I’m really curious, as Wild Turkey 101 was my regular pour for a number of years. I’ve never tried the Old Weller, and now I’m inspired to go get a bottle.

Wise words. When in doubt, do more tasting!

Yesterday’s acquisition was another bottle of Evan Williams Single-Barrel. I do like this spirit. Woodford Reserve is on tap for Thanksgiving for several reasons: I like it, it’s relatively priced, and the bottle fits well in the camp kit! :smiley:

I’m glad everybody is liking the Antique. For the price, it’s unbeatable in my book.

So, this is obviously the place to ask a question that I have been wondering about for a while.

My mother is a big Makers Mark fan, and so every year on her birthday and Christmas I buy her a bottle. I pick up the kind in the gold box, with the gold wax. Is there any difference between that and the “red wax” version, or is it all in the packaging?

Myself, I drink Knob Creek, and reading this thread has made me want some tonight. :slight_smile:

The gold wax means that the bourbon has been bottled at 101.5 proof. Currently it is only available as an export.

Look around the holidays, and Maker’s Mark has all sorts of special waxes: Red, white and blue for the 4th, Silver & Black for a special Raiders run, etc.

FWIW, I’ve had the opportunity to try a number of different labels of rye recently. Here are some very brief comments on my impressions.

Old Overholt: Cheap, drinkable, and easily accessible. A perfectly fine everyday rye, but not for serving to someone you’d want to impress. This is what I keep in my cupboard on a regular basis.

Jim Beam: Cheap, drinkable, and easily accessible. But given a choice between the Overholt and the Beam, I’d go for the Overholt.

Wild Turkey 101: I’ve had this in sazeracs and it worked, but served neat it’s definitely in the “floor cleaner” category. Avoid.

Rittenhouse 80 proof: Mostly harmless. Very light-flavored. Worth picking up if you happen to see it and the price works for you, but nothing special.

Rittenhouse bonded: Waaay better than the 80 proof. Still cheap, though. Grab a bottle if you see one.

Van Winkle 13-year rye: Good stuff. Worth serving to someone you want to impress. I would get this on a regular basis if it were carried in my local liquor stores.

Old Potrero (I forget what it was called specifically, but it was the 20-bucks-a-shot version): Tasty, but pure fire. Definitely not worth it unless you want to impress one of those people who thinks they know about booze but actually don’t.

A.J. Hirsch: Very very expensive (in the neighborhood of $150/bottle), but good. If you can afford it, go for it. If the price shocks you, don’t bother.

Black Maple Hill: Holy crap, this stuff is good. Get a bottle, keep it to yourself, and snarl at anybody who gets too close. Worth sharing only with people who have offered to perform deviant sexual acts with you. Even then, you should probably think twice about it.

So, is my liquor store just special (well it is, I admit) and so they can get this product? Interesting. It’s some sort of “limited editon” version, and I don’t seem to be able to find it online… But the references I do find agree that it is 101+ proof. No wonder she likes receiving it. :slight_smile:

Dang, sorry, that was me, not my lurker wife. :slight_smile:

Just checking back in with a review of the latest bottle: 1792 Ridgemont Reserve.

8 years old, out of Barton Brands. Very smooth, with touches of caramel, vanilla and a little bit of smoke in the finish. I could drink a lot of this. 93 proof and a very stylish bottle to boot.

Just picked up a bottle of Prichard’s Double Barrel Bourbon. After they age the bourbon and cut it down to bottling strength, they stick it back in the barrel and age it some more. It’s a gimmick, sure, but an interesting one. It has a very rich flavor. I give it a definite thumbs-up.

The NH liquor stores provided me, for hunting weekend, a very nice 750ml bottle of Bulleit Distillery 10yo Burbon for $23.

Made for a very nice pour to celebrate the taking of vealison (venison + veal aka a 46# doe) :smiley:

mrklutz, did you ever try that bottle of Old Weller Antique? I’d be interested to know how it stacks up against the WT 101, which is the only bourbon I seem to be able to enjoy since experiencing Booker’s–which is too costly for an everyday pour.

You know, I haven’t. I got distracted and forgot to pick up a bottle. Thanks for the reminder, though – I’ll see if I can grab a bottle on the way home.

Not to mention Kentucky blue to accompany Louisville red for the UK-Louisville basketball game every year.

Thanks. I’ll look forward to seeing what you think of it.

Cheers. :slight_smile:

Ok, here’s the lineup.

The whiskeys:
Booker’s, weighing in at 126.5 proof
Old Weller Antique, the 107 proof contender
Woodford Reserve, my trusty standby at 90 proof
Prichard’s Double Barreled, the 90 proof newcomer
(Alas, I have no Wild Turkey on hand and didn’t think to do a lineup until I got home.)

The context:
Marinated tri-tip steak to clear the palate. (Crackers? Bah! We’re drinking whiskey.)
The Reverend Horton Heat to set the mood

Now, bear in mind that the Old Weller goes for half the price of any of the other whiskeys present. I’m not going easy on it. That said, it held up surprisingly well. It’s not as smooth as the Woodford, which is no surprise. It has a bite and a rye flavor that are similar to the Booker’s but a bit less refined – definitely reminiscent of Wild Turkey 101. I’d place it somewhere between Wild Turkey and Booker’s if my memory serves me well. Not as rich as the Prichard’s, but more subtle. All in all, it has a good flavor and a bite that makes you take notice.

Verdict: It’s a keeper.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to get back to my steak and whiskey.

I dance the Dance of Joy! Old Weller Antique will flow through the land. (And demand will rise, so either the price will go up or they will start cutting corners to keep up, and it will be no more! Bastards!)

Tonight it’s ham for dinner, so I will pour a little Old Grand-Dad Bonded into the sauce I am preparing. Then serve a dram of the same with dinner. Ahhhhhh.

Excellent job, mrklutz! Would that I had thought to conduct such an experiment myself. If you’d place it between Booker’s and WT 101, and silenus sings its praises, that’s good enough for me. My next bottle will be the Old Weller Antique. Thanks for the update.