I wasn’t arguing the issue of where the traits spring from. I was commenting on the article’s choice of other “traits.” No, it doesn’t explicitly say that they are violent drunks, hence my comment on subtlety.
Here’s some more of their writings so you can make a better judgement:
In response to a homosexual asserting “being gay is natural for me” they stated:
“Racial discrimination and child abuse occur frequently in society, but that does not make them “natural” in the moral sense.”
Here we have to wait until the very end for them to throw in the word “despised”:
“All the crosscurrents of present-day liberation struggles are subsumed in the gay struggle. The gay moment is in some ways similar to the moment that other communities have experienced in the nation’s past, but it is also something more, because sexual identity is in crisis throughout the population, and gay people-at once the most conspicuous subjects and objects of the crisis-have been forced to invent a complete cosmology to grasp it. No one says the changes will come easily. But it’s just possible that a small and despised sexual minority will change America forever.”
Let’s not forget to get the Nazis into the act:
"While Adolf Hitler is today recognized as the central figure of Nazism, he was a less important player when the Nazi machine was first assembled. Its first leader was Ernst Roehm. Homosexual historian Frank Rector writes that “Hitler was, to a substantial extent, Roehm’s protegé”
They go on to make reference to Roehm being gay. Inferring that a gay person started the Nazi regime. Then they continue by trying to “prove” that Hitler himself was gay.
One more tidbit (there are plenty more if you wish):
“Sadly, the homosexual dimension of Nazi history is overlooked by many historians. As Duberman, Vicinus and Chauncey have stated with the title to their “gay studies” text, the role of homosexuals and pederasts has been Hidden from History. They, of course, imagine the influence of homosexuality to be positive. From the Judeo-Christian cultural context, however, the rise of homosexuality necessarily represents the diminution of Biblical morality as a restraint on human passions. Consequently, where Judeo-Christian ideals decrease, violence and depravity increase.”
In conlusion, no, I’m not fucking kidding you. Still too subtle, or do you see the pattern?
