Why doesn’t thisstrict <xhtml> web page pass the W3C.org Validator?
This is the first of 11 errors.
Line 14, Column 5: document type does not allow element “ul” here; missing one of “object”, “ins”, “del”, “map”, “button” start-tag.
<ul>
The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in which you’ve placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only ones that are both allowed there and can contain the element mentioned. This might mean that you need a containing element, or possibly that you’ve forgotten to close a previous element.
I don’t know. Your example looks identical to the ‘correct’ nested list example here:
http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/xhtml_html.asp
-However, I must be overlooking something obvious, as I replaced your nested lists with a C&P of the code on that page and it validated OK…
I have an ending <ul> instead of </ul>.
Now I’ll start splicing my real index.html into listindex.com until I find the error.
<body>
<p>
Items
<ul>
<li>SubItem</li>
<li>SubItem
<ul>
<li>SubSubItem</li>
<li>SubSubItem</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>SubItem</li>
<ul>
</p>
</body>
Its the <p> tags. Without the <ul> instead of </ul> at the end of the list and without the <p> and </p> it passes.
Do you need the <p> tags? Can you put it inside a <div> instead?
Yes but the formating is different. Within the <p></p> the items are spaced further apart.
Could that be overcome in your CSS? - something like:
.spaciouslist {
line-height: 140%
}
Then:
<div class=“spaciouslist”>
[your nested lists]
</div>
I believe you should close the </li> before opening the <ul>
<li>List item</li>
<ul>
<li>New list item</li>
</ul>
<li>Next list item</li>
And, of course, lose the P tags. Use a DIV with an ID if you need to specifically address that one list, and put a line-height on the LI styling within that ID. Otherwise just don’t bother.
Actually, I’m still a bit wet behind the ears with CSS… if you want all lists to be a bit more spacious, couldn’t you just modify the way the <li> tag works by putting:
li {
line-height: 140%
}
in the CSS?