No, you didn’t address his question. All you did was come across with a condescending Argument from Immaculate Perception™ - “right thinkers” are the only ones who see reality exactly as it is unhindered by any cognitive biases. So therefore, to disagree with them is to disagree with reality itself."
If you remove all your condescension, cognitive biases and psychological blind spots, what we’re left with is this:
*"…what about Military reports of UFO’s where planes actually chase these objects around, or where military aircraft give chase and their entire electronics are shut off etc? "
*
I think you are missing my point. The impression from the question is that there are gobs of these various Military Reports out there, many credible and undebunked.
My point is that tackling them one by one and debunking them is useless because the the clear bias of the OP is to say “Well fine about that one, but what about this one?” and there is no end to the number of stories. One could debunk a thousand in a row and there would be the thousand and first, awaiting a request for verification.
That there are gobs of military stories out there is no more persuasive than that there are gobs of civilian stories out there. We are all error-prone and the desire to Believe and interpret with bias is no respector of career choice.
Reading the FOXNewns article linked to before, it seems obvious that is the case. England (as I believe France did earlier) is declassifying “UFO reports” now.