From here.
OK. I read a lede paragraph like that, and I nod. I believe it, because I think there is a general negativity towards religion in the media and it makes sense to me.
And they seem to have a valid method:
But as I continue through the article, I find that they offer the following examples of negativity:
I assume that if they are offering examples, they would offer the worst ones, not the tamest ones. And, frankly, none of those examples seem particularly negative to me.
All three of the shows mentioned are comedies. Comedy is often found in the unexpected juxtaposition of ideas or events. I didn’t see “That 70’s Show,” but I cannot imagine the characters were having sex near a manger in order to desecrate the Nativity scene; I’m confident they they, horny teenagers that they are, were simply trying to have sex SOMEWHERE, and the comedy turns on the proximity to a manger.
I didn’t see “Last Comic Standing,” either, but - while it’s a flip and irreverent way of phrasing it - Christianity DOES offer a “Get-out-of-Hell-Free” card. That’s kind of the point of divine forgiveness, after all. And while it may not be theologically defensible, I can see someone suggesting that pedophile priests ought not to qualify. Again, though, this is a comedy - a wry commentary on a situation, not a theological instruction.
Finally, Will and Grace. I have seen this show, although not this episode. Karen’s character does not seem to to be the sort of person one looks to for guidance or inspiration. She’s constantly portrayed as boozing and pill-popping, a loveable reprobate. If Karen proposes a course of action in the show’s context, I can’t believe we’re to take it seriously. Indeed, one could argue that Karen’s advice should be observed by following its opposite. And, again, comedy exists by juxtaposing opposites: it IS funny to consider gay bar being located in a building that was once a historic church. She’s not talking about STEALING the church, but legally buying it. Presumably, the congregation that owns the property will receive fair market value, and be in a position to buy a NEW church. What’s the harm?
Now, I agree that none of the incidents aboce constitute a ringing endorsement of religion. But if that’s the worse they can point to, then I’d say there’s no problem here at all.
- Rick