Stupid Santorumisms

Santorum may have shot himself in the foot in Michigan:

The story for the last week and a half is “OMG Romney is losing to Santorum in his home state, Michigan! How inexplicable, given that his dad was Governor here.” Well, that was 50 years ago. Anybody who voted for George as governor is over 70 now. The majority of the electorate doesn’t know him except from history books. When you look at Mitt Romney’s statements over the last couple of years, it’s really not that surprising that he’s now in some trouble. “Let Detroit go bankrupt” was not a popular stance to take at the time, and now, with GM posting record profits, his attempts at retconning his position that he had a plan for a “managed bankruptcy” that would have worked so much better are sounding more than a bit hollow. This has been in the news for a while; to be perfectly clear, it’s not a secret that his statements are working against him.

So what does Santorum do? He could keep his mouth shut till after next Tuesday and rake in the disgruntled auto workers’ spite-votes against Romney, but nooo. He chimes in to remind people that he, too, opposed the auto bailout. This is a position that is visibly hurting Romney in Michigan, and Santorum jumps in and says “Me too! But even more so!” :smack:

Now, to be fair, he’s said a lot of other unpopular things in the last few days so it’s hard to say this position is exactly what has hurt him, but the fact is that after being up as much as 15% over Romney in Michigan polls in the last week, he’s back to being in a statistical tie.

Are the trees in Pennsylvania all the right height?

I saw a vague reference to this somewhere else. What is it about?

Right Height Trees

(slightly off-topic)

Santorum disgusts me on many levels (not to mention those who support him), but I need to give credit where credit is due. This is a funny story Santorum told about campaigning several years ago:

They really are doing it on purpose now, aren’t they?

re: The Crusades comment, I’d bet that the source ( assuming Santorum has any source ) is historian Thomas Madden, who is both a political conservative and strong proponent of the idea that the Crusades were a direct defense against an aggressive threat. Madden is a perfectly legitimate historian and his thesis is not in indefensible in some respects. However certain of his opinions on this particular issue I would not consider a consensus view in the academic community. There was a discussion about this topic in a thread a few years ago - here.

I watch that clip and my first thought is, “I like that boulder. That is a nice boulder.”

Apparently Mr. Rick’s Hitler comparisons go back a while…

http://www.alan.com/2012/02/20/santorum-compared-democrats-to-hitler-in-2005/

After comparing Obama to Hitler, Santorum denies comparing Obama to Hitler.

Glad he cleared that up.

Rick Santorum now has people longing for the clear logic of Sarah Palin:

Yes, he wants environmental regulation to be handled at the local and state level. Apparently this would invole building gigantic domes over these municipalities to prevent air and water pollution from impacting any other state or city.

“Santorum blasts Obama”? “Cumming rally”? “Overflow audience”?

Heh-heh, heh-heh, heh-heh…

If they had managed to work the fact that it took place in a church into the headline, it would have pegged the Awesometer.

That’s pronounced aw-SOM-itter.

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/02/21/429606/santorum-the-democratic-party-is-about-homosexuality/
Groovy!

From luci’s article:
[QUOTE=Santorum]
It’s about sexual freedom. That’s what it’s about. Homosexuality. It’s about sexual freedom.
[/quote]
Was this uttered like he was acknowledging that sexual freedom leads to gayness, and he didn’t realize he was outing his unspoken urges? Is he another Republican repressed gay man?

Or did he say it with a different inflection?

Being stupid should not be an American value.

I know that must be hard for you to accept, in that it’s so close to your heart, but it’s true. You are correct that some (dumb) Americans don’t like “being told what to believe” (aka “learning”), but that isn’t anything to be proud of. In truth, it’s a shameful thing that one of our political parties panders to ignorance and elevates it to a virtue. Hopefully it’s only a passing fad, and soon Republicans will again come to regard willful stupidity as the drain on our country that it is, but if they don’t, their own weakness will inevitably cause their downfall.

We now live in a global marketplace, and competition is stiff. America hobbles itself by refusing to acknowledge facts like evolution and global warming. We can either reject the idiocy or fall behind. People like you, intent on making our country as backwards and thick headed as possible, are destroying the United States. You are not a patriot. You are a moron.

Time and time again, he’s showing himself to be so far out of touch with mainstream American culture that he keeps making references to things America as a whole LIKES and considers GOOD THINGS as if they’re negatives. Sex, contraception, college education, the auto bailout, prenatal testing, green energy, the right to privacy, and now Woodstock?

That excellent diatribe was directed at Riicky, right? Ann needed those quotes around Santorum’s frothing being in such close proximity.

Now, Universe, I know I haven’t been a very good pantheist, but if you arrange things so Ricky Retardo comes out against the musical Hair, I’d take it for a Sign…

Oh blerg, now who looks stupid? :stuck_out_tongue:

Sorry, Ann I misread your post. That absolutely should be directed at the person who made that statement, in this case, Rick Santorum.