Okay, I’m checking into this thread really late, so I’m going to be unhip and chat about the OP for a bit.
dalovindj, you say that pop culture references are important, but despite the scores of posts to this thread, I fail to see how. You say in one of your posts that a knowledge of pop culture can change your life in very significant financial ways, and I’ll give you that, provided that your career is in the field of popular culture.
To elucidate, you say that knowledge of new/popular movies is important in the movie industry. Well, no shit. That doesn’t mean that knowledge of pop culture is inherently important. If you’re making a living as a web developer, for instance, you have to know hundreds of tags, commands, as well as a smattering of languages and multimedia programs. Sure this’ll make you a ton of money, but it doesn’t mean shit unless you’re talking shop with other web developers or trying to impress a potential client. In other words, it’s not something that you should expect everybody to know, nor be terribly disappointed in their not knowing. (Okay, the chick in your OP was an aspiring actress. She, you can be disappointed in.)
Later, you go on to quote the statement that ignorance of one’s culture is not cool, and that one needs to experience the art of a culture to appreciate its fullness. IMHO, you’re stressing the wrong half of the term “popular culture.” A quick look at popular culture tells you more about what is popular in a culture than what is important in that culture.
“Ah,” you may say, “but that is the same thing, is it not? For knowing what is popular in a culture is to know what the people of that culture value.” Yes and no. If there is a pop culture icon that is universally accepted and that has undeniable cultural importance, then, yes, that particular piece of pop culture can tell you something about the culture from which it originated. But seeing as how few movies, books, or television shows have universal appeal, intimate knowledge of these cultural artifacts can only give you insights about the people who find them particularly important. For this, you need fairly detailed knowledge, including the demographic for whom a pop culture item is important and why it is so. And once you have this knowledge, you’ve gone past mere knowledge of the pop cultural icon available from visiting the material yourself and set foot into the realm of sociology. Thus while knowledge of popular culture is not entirely worthless, it is, on its own, lacking in the ability to truly inform anybody about its parent culture.
sigh Well, I had more to say about that, but it’s 4:30 AM here, and coherence isn’t my strong suit at this hour. I will just append, then, to what Medea’s Child has said, that “culture,” a catch-all term almost synonymous with “society” in the way you’ve been using it, is something that can be understood simply by observing the interaction between people. Societal rituals and mores can be acquired through observation of simple mundanity, and the artistic (and certainly the pop cultural) works of that society are largely unnecessary in this. In other words, until one wishes to join a more specialized group of people (i.e., movie buffs, or those in “the industry”), popular culture is mere clutter and serves, at best, as conversational shorthand.
I’d also like to add that I find it quite amusing that your selections for canonical pop culture books/short stories do not contain a single entry that strikes me as being an example of popular culture. Popular culture is, by definition, rarely taught in literature classes unless said class is focusing exclusively on popular culture. The divide between popular (or genre) fiction and literary fiction is fairly well documented and seeing as how your list does, as somebody mentioned, smack strongly of required high school reading, I really think that you should either rethink your entries for this category or rethink your definition of popular culture entirely.