I don’t get this argument. It’s well-proven science that consuming sugar (any other high GI stuff, like bread or potatoes or rice) raises your blood sugar (thus giving you more energy) and then the insulin kicks in, making you “crash” (i.e. suddenly have low blood sugar) and hence be tired and sluggish. Which part of this are you arguing with?
Cheers,
Julie
Possibly discussing this thread: Does giving sweets to kids produce a sugar rush?
If so, the argument is that raised blood sugar doesn’t result in changed behavior in children, as demonstrated repeatedly by study. In other words, your “well-proven science”, even if true, isn’t affecting behavior demonstrably.
But since you don’t say for certain which column you are commenting on, it might be some other issue Cecil is tackling. 
I never understood the sugar high argument. It is like saying that if you put more gas in your gas tank, your car will go faster. It does not make sense.
I know I am just one case, so it doesn’t prove anything. However, I have type 2 diabetes and I have never really felt any different when a glucometer indicated that my blood sugar was too high. I can certainly feel it when my blood sugar is too low. That makes me dubious about consumption of sweets (presumably causing temporary hyperglycemia) causing “sugar highs” by non-pyschosomatic means.
The BBC series “The truth about food” also ran an, admittedly small and unrigorous, experiment on this. BBC - Science & Nature - Sugar and Hyperactivity
The result supported the hypothesis that the infamous sugar high is a result of sugar intake being correlated with “wild” parties, combined with parents’ confirmation bias.
naita, at the bottom of that page they say “A 49g bar of Dairy Milk contains 5.5 teaspoons of sugar,” Do you know what they mean there? Are they talking about chocolate or does milk come in bars in England?
“Dairy Milk” is a brand-name chocolate bar manufactured by Cadbury.
Powers &8^]
I agree - as a Type 1 for nearly 30 years, I have NEVER felt any benefit in energy or wakefulness from a blood sugar over 120 - on the contrary, as things get too high I feel sick, bloated, and nauseous.
FWIW, 100% of the time I’ve convinced someone to take a test on my blood glucometer when they have been convinced, as in swear on a stack of Bibles convinced, that their blood sugar is “shooting to the moon” or “crashing low”, their blood sugar has tested between 100-110, with remarkable consistency. The typical reaction is to say “huh, your meter must be wrong.” :rolleyes:
On a related note, I’ve heard that in the U.S., a typical chocolate bar can cost an entire payday, even up to $100000. Is that true?
Everybody loves a comedian.
Happen to know any?
Maybe he just feels like a nut? 
I’ve never felt it myself. And I eat a buttload of sugar. After a while I might be hungry again if it wasn’t enough, but then I just eat again. I’ve never felt the “crash” unless it was from just plain not eating enough.
Sugar may not make you high, but I do know that you will feel strange if you suddenly go from a high sugar intake to a lower one. Back in my sixth grade anti-drug program, we actually were encouraged to go without any table sugar for a couple weeks so we could feel the effect of a (slight) withdrawal. I don’t know if it was safe, but the symptoms the kids had matched the definition of withdrawal, and we hadn’t even been taught them yet.
Give me a break!
If you’re eating sugar by the buttload, you’re doing it wrong. I’ll give you a break friedo, as soon as I find that whatchamacallit.
EvilTOJ said:
snickers