Sungazing...WTF?

Was reading the articleI posted above again and found this little nugget of wisdom from the director of that film:

I’m sorry, regardless of how you feel about religion and spirituality, there is only one way of thinking about the question “is it a good idea to give up eating and stare at the sun instead” that makes any sense at all, and its the rational, scientific way, that answers “no”.

I think what burns me the most about these idiots trying to illuminate themselves by staring at the sun - something that even the birds and beasts of the field know better than to do - is when they do finally go blind, guess whose taxes will be funding their disability checks?

Look on the bright side, at least we won’t have to pay for their food stamps. Just a little water and an occasional bag of mulch.

The even better news is that they won’t last too long. we’re forgetting about their chances of melanoma.

True…and they’ll become carbon sinks!

The OP might wish to do a board search on the term breatharian,as this topic has been discussed a number of times previously. I don’t recall anyone finding it remotely plausible.

What’s wrong with just, you know… eating? Will God like me more if I don’t?

You know, that’s a good question. Are these people just the extreme end of the scale of picky eaters?

I expect it’s the whole “I am above the concerns of the material world and thus superior” mentality.

Don’t treat me like a fool. If you would read the original post you would see that I found the character’s (HRM) claim that he did not require food was laughable. The documentary covered a wide range of practitioners with different approaches to the subject. Do you not remember the comedic scene when HRM was confronted after being photographed in the Indian restaurant? Oh, that’s right you were “multi-tasking”.
My approach to this documentary was more towards soliciting a reply from people who had experienced positive or negative results after trying this lifestyle. The benefits purported by them are along the lines of SAD therapy. Light therapy has been around for thousands of years.
What I found most difficult to believe was the colossal amount of ignorant responses I tapped into with this post.
“Oh brave new world…” I’ll take my soma now and shut up.

Then why not ask “Does sitting in the sunlight make you feel better?” There was no reason to bring in this woo-woo documentary, following some extreme nutters, if all you you thought you were asking about is light therapy.

Given a minute or two of Googling I am sure we can find all sorts of studies that show improvement in moods with exposure to light. You don’t need to collect personal anecdotes from fringe practitioners to get data. In fact, personal testimonials are one of the worst ways to learn whether a health regime actually works.

You poisoned this well yourself by starting out asking about the whackos.

Using SAD Therapy to justify looking seriously at this “sungazing” woo just because they both involve light is the equivalent of using acupuncture as an excuse to take voodoo dolls serious because they both use pins.

I’m still trying to figure out what response would satisfy the increasingly agitated OP. Ten people recounting their experiences staring at the sun? “It really helped my mood, but the going blind part brought me down again.”

It seems to me that a necessarily small portion of the general population would be stupid enough to try this in the first place, and the overlap between that population and denizens of a board generally hostile to the supernatural would be zero. Plus, as VT and others have pointed out, the fact that practitioners are guaranteed to have eye damage makes demanding their presence on an Internet website problematic and comedic.

So, for fast food, do these people go to a tanning salon? Or just keep a sun lamp in the car?

You are upset because we aren’t taking this seriously?

  1. It is hard to take your request seriously when you try to pass off the above as fact, then repeatedly refuse to back off from your claims.
  2. We are serious enough not to give this very dangerous woo any credit what so ever. The only publicity they deserve is bad publicity, and we are refusing to look at the supposed positive side of going blind and starving to death.

Try to take your disappointment in stride. I once started a thread to debate the pros and cons of cyanide therapy, and not a single person who’d participated in the ritual bothered to show up.

So the results so far are 50/50?

However, several *married *people did report the results on their spouses.

I bet they were all pretty happy with the results.

“… and if you saw their wife you’d stare into the sun too.” (Thank you, I’ll be here all week.)

nm