Of course, but until then:
That was totally on purpose. Not only is Justin Raping Micheal Jackson’s songs, he tries to rape his siter on National TV!
I know it’s a typo, but considering the age difference, it’s quite apt!
What the hell is the matter with her nipple? :eek:
It looks like she’s wearing a nipple shield (work safe, picturewise, though it does have the word “nipple” repeated umpteen times).
How come such a weedy git like Justin Timberlake gets to hang out with all these chicks in such risque situations? Does he have a huge dick, or what the hell is it?
Hmm, the stunt was CBS approved?
Maybe, maybe not. Now Drudge’s front page says this:
CBS Statement on Janet Jackson— CBS deeply regrets the incident that occured during the Super Bowl halftime show. We attended all rehearsals throughout the week and there was no indication that any such thing would happen. The moment did not conform to CBS broadcast standards and we would like to apologize to anyone who was offended.
That was in fact JJ’s boob. I work at a newspaper and I saw a picture from The Associated Press. She was wearing a nipple ring that looks like some torture device taken out of the middle ages.
Damn, that really did happen… I looked away too. Here’s what we’re wondering: she really does look surprised, but that piece of her top came right off. Makes it look like it was supposed to, I think… but who knows.
Statement by NFL Executive Vice President Joe Browne regarding the Super Bowl halftime show: “We were extremely disappointed by elements of the MTV-produced Halftime show. They were totally inconsistent with assurances our office was given about the show. It’s unlikely that MTV will produce another Super Bowl halftime.”
That’s it, dammit. Next year we’re bring back Up With People.
You know, if this had happened during the halftime show for the XFL Championship game, it would have been considered “tame.”
sigh … I miss the XFL
How about Hooray For Everything? “Get dancin, dancin, dancin, dancin…”
Justin claims it was a wardrobe malfunction. A likely story…
This is an extreme close-up of the jewelry from the wire-service photo. It’s only not work-safe if you know what it is, so I hope it doesn’t run afoul of the rules. I concur with jayjay on the nipple shield idea. As such, I don’t think this would be considered adequate coverage by your average puritan-area strip club.
I think the scariest possibility is that the exposure was unintentional - and that Janet Jackson routinely wears that thing on her nipple.
Oh my … it looks like it covers up (part of) the aureola, but not the nipple itself! :eek:
What makes me think this is obviously a set up is the double take Janet does post breast exposure.
Seriously,who does a head-spin double take in real life? Not to mention that Justin looks thoroughly unphased by the revealing.
IMHO, this is just another Spears-Madonna type of publicity stunt.
Most likely, Janet wanted a boost to her ever decreasing ::ahem:: exposure in the media. Any moment now Janet will be appearing in countless magazines and talk shows feigning embarassment over the whole thing.
I believe that was fake. Has anyone seen MTV’s new advertising? It is all about shock value. Most of the commercials from their reality shows portray their real world “Houses” and Road Rules “Road Trips” as a big brawl. MTV has certainly changed their rhetoric about TV shows and now public events. I guess drama sells.
Upon further review, the judgment on the field stands. The pull of the left hand caused the breast to come loose. By rule, there is no fumble, and Ms. Jackson retains possession. First down!