While some folks, especially people who make their livings off of investments, can profit from strategies around a tanking economy, there are many more who depend on a functioning economy to make their money. The easiest example of this is any company that sells things to regular people. From SC Johnson, to Target, to 3M and so-on. They are also part of the uber wealthy (managers, C-suite, owners, etc) and they won’t want this.
Publicly naming specific individuals is a terrible, aggressive tactic.
I agree with you, and those people won’t be cheering when Trump tanks the economy. But they may lack the influence (read: spare cash lying around with which to curry Trump’s favor) to do anything about it.
I still believe that if the economy starts being so obviously broken that FoxNews happy talk can’t convince people that everything is fine, then Trump will need a Big Event that will put the mass of Americans in the mood to start blaming scapegoats and also to start putting up with restrictions that no American would accept as of 27 November 2024.
If we are in Trump’s heart’s desire: a nation in which no ill is ever spoken of him and no protests occur (after a few that meet reprisals), then it won’t matter that businesses can’t sell their products and that their factories are shut down. Because Trump can always decree that the factories open up again but this time to manufacture weapons and gallows and coffins. And the owners may not be thrilled but they don’t want to displease Dear Leader, so they will shut up about not being thrilled.
Trump wants what Xi and Putin have: large economies that may well be doing MUCH less business than they would if they were located in democracies—but that are doing well enough to keep Xi and Putin in power. And no one dares say a word against Xi and Putin.
In short, Trump would be fine with widespread privation in the US and not-much-of-a market for the goods and services being produced on 11/27/24. Because he doesn’t really care if US business thrives or goes under. He’s got his, Jack.
One merely has to remember that the destruction of the World Trade Center made Trump the owner of the tallest building in NYC . . . and that was the most important thing that happened on 9/11.
Yeah. If people are counting on things not changing much due to Trump supposedly possessing the human trait of caring about what most people care about (such as the national economy or his own reputation as a good manager), they are destined for disappointment. He is not within the range of emotional normality.
He’s not only an utter narcissist; he’s old and decrepit. The fact is that he’s not likely to live too many years longer, and it wouldn’t bother him in the slightest if five minutes after he died the entire planet caught fire and exploded. As far as he’s concerned once he dies the universe has fulfilled its sole purpose and no longer has any value or meaning.
So even if he actually considers the future effects of his actions, he simply won’t care. Or it’ll outright tickle his ego to know that he wrecked the nation or the world as a last exercise in power tripping.
It’s more than a bit terrifying that a man that old and decrepit may have to decide, within fifteen minutes, whether to launch the missiles that will end in the destruction of civilization and the deaths of billions.
Especially when he’s known to have a fascination with nuclear weapons. I think the odds are that he’ll nuke something, at some point. I don’t think he’ll want to die without having done that first.
I don’t suppose we could get every medical professional to sign an oath: ‘I will not, using any language or means, tell Donald Trump that he is terminally ill and/or has only some set amount of time to live.’
They’d be saving billions of lives if they refrained from telling Donald that he might as well destroy the world that (in his mind) only he inhabits…
For now. As I said in that post, You are not thinking evil enough. Don’t you remember Birtherism? What makes you think that executive order will not include people such as Barack Obama? (And, of course, the magaflatearthers will insist on emphasizing his middle name. That’s one of their ways of othering Obama.)

A federal court should put a stop to ornerous requirements to establish proof of citizenship, but I don’t have a lot of faith in the courts these days.
As I said in that post:

The inevitable court cases will end up at the Supreme Court. How do you think they will rule?
I’m sorry I asked the wrong question. The correct question is: “Do you think the Supremes will overrule?”

I don’t suppose we could get every medical professional to sign an oath: ‘I will not, using any language or means, tell Donald Trump that he is terminally ill and/or has only some set amount of time to live.’
I’m not worried about that happening. His doctors know that he hired them for only two things. One, to tell him that he is the strongest, healthiest, smartest person they have ever seen in all of their years of practice. Two, to sign his prescriptions to aderal. They aren’t going to tell him he’s about to die.
Also after surviving the assassination attempt i’m pretty sure he thinks he’s immortal, so he probably wouldn’t believe them. So even if they did tell him I doubt that he would beleive them.

Also - how does one go about one’s parents were here legally?
I’d have to check my birth certificate but I believe Los Angeles County has the birth place of the parents on it.
But again, you’re forgetting the Birtherism saga. Your “birth certificate” is an obvious fake, because it’s got layers and pixels and shit.

You are not thinking evil enough. Think of the federal public assistance programs that you need to show proof of citizenship for. That means even though these people were born in the United States, they won’t be able to get any of those public funds
Well, yes, but it’s even worse than that, because without a passport, no other country will let them in, so they can’t even escape the hellscape that America will become for them.
I do not believe for a moment that executive order will not include a prohibition on even issuing birth certificates for certain children. The excuse he will use is that citizenship is a federal perogative and thus the states do not get to make that determination.
Mind you, that’s not what the constitution says, but, hey, what does that rag have to do with anything lately?

I do not believe for a moment that executive order will not include a prohibition on even issuing birth certificates for certain children.
The federal government doesn’t issue birth certificates.
…yet.
…and they aren’t going to start any time soon, because that’s not a power granted to the federal government by the Constitution, therefore making it a 10th amendment matter for the states to handle, and the Constitution isn’t getting amended in any of our lifetimes.
What prevents Trump from violating the Constitution?