This is my first (probably weak) pit rant.
I caught about 5 minutes of Sylvia Browne on Montel Williams this morning while getting ready for work. I was only able to watch for about one minute at a time because I get too embarrassed for the people asking the questions (I’m clearly biased).
The following excerpts are from memory and I welcome corrections.
A grieving daughter is shown in a profile clip describing how she lost her mother in an auto accident when she was 11, and how terribly she misses her. She suspects that the death was not an accident.
Sylvia Browne picks up that the daughter does not think the death is an accident and tells the daughter that she probably knows who the killer is. The daughter has a look come over her face like there is someone she suspects and now she has “proof”. This ought to make her life better.
Sylvia Browne then goes on to the next question from an audience member and just leaves the daughter hanging. Doesn’t dropping such a bombshell require some follow up? Surely the daughter would have had follow up questions.
Sylvia Browne seems to show disregard for the audience. She answers complex questions throwing out tidbits of “truth” in one or two sentences. She tends to talk more to Montel than to the audience member asking the question.
A mother says that her daughter died after the daughter’s engagement was broken off by her fiancee. The mother asks if her daugter died of a broken heart? Sylvia confirms that people can die of a broken heart and this is what happened to the daugther. Usually Sylvia’s utter bullshit at least gives (false) hope the grieving person. How is this supposed to help? The mother now “knows” her daughter died because she was in unbearable emotional pain. She will now blame the fiancee for her daugters death. If she harms the fiancee, will Sylvia be held legally responsible?
A sister relates a story of how her brother starting suffering frequent seizures which have caused brain damage.The brother no longer functions as an independent adult. She asks Sylvia to shed light on what happened. Sylvia asks the sister if she was aware that her brother was slipped a drug like Ectasy. The sister if visibly shaken by this information. So now the sister can be bitter that what happened to her brother was a criminal act, and not an inevitable occurrance.
It just makes me sick! Most of what she predicts could be easily verified over time. Montel could do a follow-up show and see how the predictions came out. I can’t beleive how he fauns all over Sylvia! He does half of the cold reading for her by constantly offering suggestions and possible reasons. Some of his shows may have some socially redeeming value, but why does he close down his mind when she is on (okay, probably money)? If he really has no doubts about her powers, why doesn’t he arrange a test (okay, probably money)?
I am sure everyone here is aware that James Randi has challenged Sylvia to test her powers and that she accepted this challenge on the Larry King show (another of her ass kissers). As of today it has been 191 days since she accepted. Of course she will never go through with this test.
I just hate her so much because of how she becomes rich of other people’s grief. At least she could wash her hair once in a while and not look like such an old hag!