I guess it depends on how you define rape. They might not have struggled or whatever, but you can’t very well give consent if you’re defined as property.
She also said that he hadn’t actually stated it, but agreed with it. There’s not much difference, IMO.
Shodan, I’m glad to hear your son is home safe.
I’m sorry, but that is Huerta88, not Shodan. You do understand how usernames work, right? Maybe I better explain.
People pick different names so that what they write and post can be identified easily. That way people don’t mistakenly or purposefully ascribe opinions and content to the wrong people. So when a user named Huerta88 writes something, everybody knows that it is that poster, and not somebody else, like say, for example, Shodan.
Wow, you’re an asshole.
No, maybe you shouldn’t. You first accused me of making the statement and attributing it to him. But instead of owning up to that mistake and apologizing for your stupidass mistake when I show you that you’re wrong, you are choosing to dig yourself further into the idiot hole.
From the start I said he wasn’t the first person to make that accusation. Okay? Your attempt to play gotcha ya is a fail.
Grow up.
Because, as was mentioned in the thread, you wanted your grievance. It allows you to play the victim card, and complain that black women are the victims of racism, and so on. Since it turns out that black-on-white rape is so rare as to be statistically almost undetectable, that argument falls over.
Which upsets those who are used to winning a debate every time they play the race card, and explains why you were/are so desperate to find something else to shore it up.
Again, this is something you made up and assigned to others.
Pretty close - the trainwreck followed your attempts to argue that when you hear hoofbeats, it is just as likely to be zebras as horses. Even standing in the middle of the farking OK Corral.
The other thing that you couldn’t seem to get over was that sure enough, exactly what was expected turned out to be the case. White-on-black rape is quite rare, especially in Durham NC.
No, that you were disappointed to find out that it was not the case, because it blew holes in your notion that refusal to believe that an unlikely event is unlikely must be because of racism.
You made the assertion that anyone who searches for data on race and crime must be doing so out of racist motives -
I don’t recall if that was before or after you or one of your cohort lied about not calling anyone racist, but that was in there somewhere too.
What you made clear was that you were disappointed that white-on-black rape was extremely rare. That’s why you posted the foolishness about how anyone who does any analysis of race in relation to crime has to be doing so out of the idea that blacks are inherently prone to crime. You did this as a way to dismiss the DoJ evidence that white on black rape is almost vanishingly rare.
You had an idea in your head, and were bound and determined to cling to it no matter what.
You posted this -
This was well after it was pointed out that the lacrosse team called the service from which they hired the strippers to complain that the strippers were black. Did this fact interrupt you? Nor for a moment. You were throwing out straw as hard as you could.
It seems rather obvious that you were frantically, not to say desperately, doing your damndest to argue that the LW in question was actually credible. It was rather obvious then, and became increasingly so, that she was not. You, however, clung to the notion that somehow or other, racism must have been involved. If not by the lacrosse team, then by some of the several who kept correcting you. And also by me, who mostly just laughed at you, once it was clear that you were beyond reason.
Thank you.
Regards,
Shodan
Frantically waving your hands around for distraction isn’t helping. You still haven’t provided a cite where **Shodan **said you wanted to be raped by a white man, like you said here:
Yeah, I didn’t understand the whole “slavemaster” thing. Because of today’s statistics, we’re supposed to believe that there was no rape going on by white slave owners on black slave women?
If you’re talking about white-on-black rape as I’m assuming you are, you’re wrong. This was repeatedly pointed out to you, by people other than myself, but you insist on believing an absurdity. (I guess that this is proof my disappointment, huh?)
Not that this had anything to do what I was talking about in that thread anyway.
And I still believe that if someone uses a person’s race to discredit a rape allegation and justifies themselves by erroneously applying racial crime statistics, they are being racist. Yeah, I do. And I could give a damn if that hurts your feelings.
You forgot to include a relevant part of that same post by you with the face:
Bolding mine.
Let’s see the actual post where Shodan does that.
This whole thing is weak. You the face isn’t willing to do the homework. It’s bullshit.
Let me get this straight. You can’t stand a guy because you don’t like his ideology, so that somehow gives you a license to suspend all civility and sense of common decency when dealing with him?
Kind of sounds like Bush’s rationale for greenlighting the torture of POWs.
You have met the enemy and he is… you.
But… But… Shodan started it.:eek:
Gotta love the ad here.
The Barack Obama bronze collectors busts. If only Shodan had used the word bronze instead.
Yes, white-on-black. My bad. However, I am not wrong.
Also not correct.
Of course, you also said that no one could reliably determine the incidence of rape in the USA, so it is pretty obvious that you want to turn your faith in statistics on and off, depending on whether or not you can use it to accuse people who are whaling the tar out of your arguments racist.
No worries, I’m fine. Being called racist doesn’t usually bother me anymore. Too many times when it was used the way you have.
Regards,
Shodan
Yes, you are wrong. It took me two minutes to pull up this link above from North Carolina’s crime registry.
The methodology used by the DoJ was not sensitive enough to assess crimes falling below a certain frequency in the greater US population. Black women comprise about 6% of the total population, so their rate of victimization is going to be difficult to assess using a telephone survey. But that doesn’t mean those crimes are “vanishingly rare”. All one has to go to a state where there is a relatively large black populace and this becomes obvious.
And yes, this was pointed out several times in that thread. Who the hell knows why it was disregarded. Probably because it was infinitely more entertaining for you and others to bray like donkeys over what is a misinterpretation of crime statistics, than to actually deal with stuff like facts and logic.
Prediction: you with the face will never, ever link to that specific post by Shodan, and yet will never ever admit she was wrong.
Actually, in the thread being referenced, Huerta88 was the first to say that he felt that you with the face would be happier if white-on-black rape were more common, and then later on in the thread, Shodan said that based on you with the face’s subsequent posts, he was inclined to agree with Huerta88 on this topic. Shodan’s post.
Wow, what an incredibly ugly thread that was.